Re: Adding floppy drives to my PDP-11?

2019-04-13 Thread Glen Slick via cctalk
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 3:07 PM Charles via cctalk wrote: > > What about smaller drives (RX50? RX33?)... can those be interfaced to the > 11/23+ Qbus? Pick up a common as dirt M7555 RQDX3. If you don't have a BA23 with the built in distribution board for the M7555 RQDX3, then pick up an M9058 dis

Re: Adding floppy drives to my PDP-11?

2019-04-13 Thread allison via cctalk
On 04/13/2019 06:07 PM, Charles via cctalk wrote: > I have a PDP-11/23+ with two RL02's in a corporate cabinet but no > floppy drives. Also an RXV21 (M8029) card. > > My PDP-8/A has RX01 drives, and I was hoping just to run the cable > over to the -11 when I wanted to use floppies on it. > But afte

Re: Adding floppy drives to my PDP-11?

2019-04-13 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
On 4/13/19 3:07 PM, Charles via cctalk wrote: > Other thoughts? find one of the dual-wide rx02 compatible floppy boards then you can use whatever kind of 8" drives you like and you can format media

Adding floppy drives to my PDP-11?

2019-04-13 Thread Charles via cctalk
I have a PDP-11/23+ with two RL02's in a corporate cabinet but no floppy drives. Also an RXV21 (M8029) card. My PDP-8/A has RX01 drives, and I was hoping just to run the cable over to the -11 when I wanted to use floppies on it. But after some searching, it appears that the RXV21 will only work

Re: Interesting article in Spectrum about IBM's System/360

2019-04-13 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 04/13/2019 09:11 AM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk wrote: For example, the IBM 7010 was an IBM 1410 done up in 7000 series technology (and was a compatible super-set of the 1410 and, via a toggle switch, the 1401). It had no architectural relationship with the 7090/7094, nor did the 7070 or 7080, n

Re: Interesting article in Spectrum about IBM's System/360

2019-04-13 Thread Jay Jaeger via cctalk
On 4/12/2019 1:15 PM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote: > The article says: > > Poughkeepsie’s engineers were close to completing work on a set of four >> computers known as the 8000s that were compatible with the 7000s. > > > AFAICT, that is totally wrong. The 8000 series was completely INCOMPATIBLE