Hey Dave,
I think the two guys working the tools originally were Bob Rosenbaum
and Harvey Schlesinger.
You are pretty much correct on the diffs between KMC and DMC. KMC had
180NS instruction time, and larger ram than the DMC iirc on that
point.
I worked on both with Remi Lissee.
I designed the DMC
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 05:59:40 + (UTC)
> From: Thomas Moss
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Tips on reviving a TU56 + TD8E?
>
...
> I've recently bought a TU56 for my PDP-8/e, and am looking for some
> advice on getting it to work.
>
...
> ... I found a copy of the sou
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:39 PM Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
> > From: Ethan Dicks
>
> > a DEC sync serial board since that part is nowhere to be found right
> > now.
>
> I dunno, I see them fairly often on eBait (well, often compared to some other
> things, e.g. TU56 parts... :-)
"P
Hello.
I have two card cages out of a pair of Linotron 202 phototypesetting machines,
and have been hunting for documentation for the Naked Mini systems used in them
for over a year now. The Computer Automation CPU boards in the systems have
been a complete mystery to me until recently. To make
Thanks to everyone who has sent suggestions about remote job submission
from a simulated PDP-11 to a simulated IBM/370.
Although I do want to get this working on a simulated PDP-11 running
RSX-11M, the mention of the Unix 'send' command grabbed my attention, since
that rings a vague bell in my mem
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:29:43 -0700
From: Glen Slick
Subject: Re: Remote job submission from PDP-11
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:04 AM Paul Koning wrote:
>
> > On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk
wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > I was curious about this DEC M8704 DMS11-DA that sold che
> From: Ethan Dicks
> a DEC sync serial board since that part is nowhere to be found right
> now.
I dunno, I see them fairly often on eBait (well, often compared to some other
things, e.g. TU56 parts... :-)
QBUS or UNIBUS? And there are lots of different ones, which I confess I don't
On 10/8/20 2:38 AM, Tomas By wrote:
I meant products. In your terms (I believe), the upper bit is part
of the PO and the lower one is "mobile".
(There may have been some evolution, so that in earlier versions the
dialling-in server was a separate thing.)
It seems like we're in agreement abou
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 12:08 PM, Jim Manley via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> If you try to access the paper describing the 2017 - 2018 restoration work,
> you soon crash into an academic publication paywall, but if you're
> persistent enough, as my frugal, self-funded computing and robotics
> students a
If you try to access the paper describing the 2017 - 2018 restoration work,
you soon crash into an academic publication paywall, but if you're
persistent enough, as my frugal, self-funded computing and robotics
students and I are, you will eventually find this link to the PDF of the
paper at the au
Den ons 7 okt. 2020 kl 22:19 skrev Peter Coghlan via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org>:
>
>
> However, I know of at least two projects which implement bisync line to
> TCP/IP gateways to interface to IBM terminals using additional hardware.
> Perhaps it might be possible to adapt one or both to do R
On Thu, 08 Oct 2020 03:41:03 +0200, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
> On 10/7/20 6:57 PM, Tomas By wrote:
> > [...] I think the bottom two are the same (i.e. delete "mobile" and
> > change "remote"->"mobile").
>
> I don't think they are.
>
> They may be the same software / product. But they are s
12 matches
Mail list logo
