On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 1:53 AM osi.superboard via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> maybe this helps
>
>
> https://pic2.avaluer.org/imgspic/a/r/k/m/r/-vintage_ti_980_ttl_based_minicomputer_w_1103_ram_boards_texas_instruments-3_27.jpg
Thanks. That looks like a 980B to me.
> > The only conclusion I can draw is that Google is arbitrary and doesn't
> > care and I'm one of the rare beneficiaries of their arbitrariness.
>
> I'm quite convinced that Google isn't arbitrary. It's just that there
> are a LOT more variables in play than we know about, much less have
>
And just to add on a data point (Bill, I know you're not the enemy here), one
of my personally-maintained mail servers does TLS and the other doesn't, I do
have proper reverse DNS but used not to, and while I have SPF I've never done
DKIM, and I've never had any trouble getting mail to Gmail.
On 12/30/20 4:35 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
The only conclusion I can draw is that Google is arbitrary and doesn't
care and I'm one of the rare beneficiaries of their arbitrariness.
I'm quite convinced that Google isn't arbitrary. It's just that there
are a LOT more variables in
> As I said, I don't have problems sending mail to Amazon, Microsoft or any of
> the large (or small) email providers except for gmail.com and other Google
> email services. It really is just Google. I do have DNS properly configured,
> SPF in place and no TLS. I can't be bothered setting up
On 12/30/20 13:55, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
That's not true.
You don't have to do the cryptographic heavy lifting on the classic
computer. You can easily do the cryptographic heavy lifting on other
more contemporary computers which are
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:35 AM Peter Corlett via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:13:40AM -0500, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
> [...]
> > Attempting to pull in this thread a tad, there are relatively simple
> > measures that can be taken to bring a private
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
That's not true.
You don't have to do the cryptographic heavy lifting on the classic computer.
You can easily do the cryptographic heavy lifting on other more contemporary
computers which are used as a smart host for the classic computers.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:07 AM Ethan Dicks wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:23 PM Josh Dersch via cctalk
> wrote:
> > A straight TI 980 (not one of the later 980A or 980B variants) appeared
> on
> > my doorstep this afternoon.
>
> Interesting. Unfortunately, I have no docs (outside of
On 12/30/20 9:35 AM, Peter Corlett via cctalk wrote:
This means that classic computers can no longer send email, because
they don't have enough grunt to overcome this artificial barrier.
That's not true.
You don't have to do the cryptographic heavy lifting on the classic
computer. You can
>
> Attempting to pull in this thread a tad, there are relatively simple
> measures that can be taken to bring a private mail server into compliance
> with gmail, Amazon, Microsoft level mail server protocol and
> authentication. Its not just gmail. The simplest measures are done with
> DNS and
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:13:40AM -0500, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
[...]
> Attempting to pull in this thread a tad, there are relatively simple
> measures that can be taken to bring a private mail server into compliance
> with gmail, Amazon, Microsoft level mail server protocol and
>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:19 AM Chris Zach via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> > Attempting to pull in this thread a tad, there are relatively simple
> > measures that can be taken to bring a private mail server into compliance
> > with gmail, Amazon, Microsoft level mail server
On 12/30/2020 5:36 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 12/30/20 3:19 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
Anyone recognize this card:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/313323417718
I looked, and it doesn't seem to be any of those for a PDP-11. However, I
see the DRAM array is 12x4 chips, which makes
Attempting to pull in this thread a tad, there are relatively simple
measures that can be taken to bring a private mail server into compliance
with gmail, Amazon, Microsoft level mail server protocol and
authentication. Its not just gmail. The simplest measures are done with
DNS and TLS. Most
>
> Of course. It makes trouble to other net users and tries to preserve
> itself by hiding complaints. Life would be easier for it if it
> actually tried to imitate poorly working spam catcher.
>
> Now imagine that there is no "off switch". It can only be persuaded by
> sending email to it, but
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:25:13AM -0500, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote:
> >Google need to review their motto and start living by it.
>
> Google ditched their "Don't be evil" motto a long long time ago. Now
> it's "what is best for google?".
Well, I do not think goog needs to do anything other
On 12/30/20 3:19 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
Anyone recognize this card:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/313323417718
I looked, and it doesn't seem to be any of those for a PDP-11. However, I
see the DRAM array is 12x4 chips, which makes me think it might be for a
PDP-8?
Noel
Anyone recognize this card:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/313323417718
I looked, and it doesn't seem to be any of those for a PDP-11. However, I
see the DRAM array is 12x4 chips, which makes me think it might be for a
PDP-8?
Noel
Hi all,
Does anybody here know what "8041 Error: did not respond to 0AAH
command" might mean?
(p. 70 in the HP OmniBook 300, 425, 430, 530 Service Manual)
/Tomas
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:23 PM Josh Dersch via cctalk
wrote:
> A straight TI 980 (not one of the later 980A or 980B variants) appeared on
> my doorstep this afternoon.
Interesting. Unfortunately, I have no docs (outside of what's on Bitsavers).
Mine is the later 980A variety, FWIW, with fat
Hi Josh,
maybe this helps
https://pic2.avaluer.org/imgspic/a/r/k/m/r/-vintage_ti_980_ttl_based_minicomputer_w_1103_ram_boards_texas_instruments-3_27.jpg
Thomas
Am 30.12.2020 um 01:23 schrieb Josh Dersch via cctalk:
Hey all --
A straight TI 980 (not one of the later 980A or 980B variants)
22 matches
Mail list logo