Greetings, Ben.
I am replying directly because I do not have a definitive answer.
On 2021-04-08 00:32, Ben Huntsman via cctalk wrote:
I know this is a strange place to ask, but it's as good a place as any.
Anyone on here used IBM's XLC in very old versions?
Anyone know what the argument
Certainly the published interface is constrained by what was
"officially" released. Just pondering if there was an internal
engineering roadmap from 16->18->22 bits around this time or did things
evolve more discretely?
I think it evolved. Remember there was one type of core memory for the
On 4/9/21 6:05 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> Linked lists go back a long way. FAT is one, in a sense. DECtape file
> systems for DOS (also RSTS) are linked, in the blocks. The same goes for the
> CDC 6000 file system (more precisely, it has contiguous blocks within a
> track, and links
On 4/8/21 4:48 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> From: Jerry Weiss
> I always wondered why the RKV11-D was only 16 bit addressable.
The manual (EK-RKV11-OP-001) says: "Since the 11/03 BUS structure has no
provision for extended addressing, no connection is made to the bus from
Linked lists go back a long way. FAT is one, in a sense. DECtape file systems
for DOS (also RSTS) are linked, in the blocks. The same goes for the CDC 6000
file system (more precisely, it has contiguous blocks within a track, and links
from the last block in the track to the next track
