Re: Ultrix-11

2021-08-17 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
I thought V7M and Ultrix were entirely diferent and unrelated things. At least on the Pro, DEC released a betal version of the one (which I tried when it came out) and then canceled it and replaced it by a release of the other. I forgot which came first, other than that the beta was really

Re: Ultrix-11

2021-08-17 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
images up under http://bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp11/floppyimages/rx50/V7M-11-V1.0_6_USR_RX50-QJ083-H3.zip

Re: Ultrix-11

2021-08-17 Thread Dennis Grevenstein via cctalk
> Am 17.08.2021 um 17:40 schrieb Warner Losh : > > Having looked at the sources to both and running diffs with tuhs, I can > confirm this is the case. And ultrix-32 had different version numbers than > ultrix-11. But the vax and mips versions shared the same sources as far as I > can tell

Re: Ultrix-11

2021-08-17 Thread Warner Losh via cctalk
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021, 6:46 AM Dennis Grevenstein via cctech < cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Bill Gunshannon wrote: > > > > With 3.1 available why would you want to run 2.0? Someone mentioned > > a 4.0. I don't remember there ever being anything after 3.1 (promised, > > but never saw it

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-17 Thread Chris Hanson via cctalk
On Aug 14, 2021, at 3:54 PM, J. David Bryan via cctalk wrote: > I guess the operative question is whether people tend to view PDF pages on > a server or download files and view them locally. Even when viewing files locally, linearization is important for not having to load too much of the

H7868 Power Supply Schematics

2021-08-17 Thread Antonio Carlini via cctalk
I have a non-functioning H7868 PSU. This is one of the two PSUs used in a BA214 chassis (and probably elsewhere). This one seems to be dead: the green LED doesn't come on at all, there is no sign of life and no +5V appears on the BA214 Qbus. (I did use a load board when testing, so that's

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-17 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On Aug 17, 2021, at 1:47 PM, ED SHARPE via cctalk > wrote: > > but does tumble OVER compress things? Over compress? The normal, and only really valid, practice with black & white documents is lossless compression, where that term has no meaning. There are those who don't understand

Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-17 Thread ED SHARPE via cctalk
but  does tumble OVER compress  things?a lot of what we have we like  to  go  back and pull nice  things  out  for  display... In a message dated 8/16/2021 10:45:48 PM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes:  On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 14:20, Wayne Sudol wrote: > Out of

Re: Ultrix-11

2021-08-17 Thread Dennis Grevenstein via cctalk
Bill Gunshannon wrote: > > With 3.1 available why would you want to run 2.0? Someone mentioned > a 4.0. I don't remember there ever being anything after 3.1 (promised, > but never saw it delivered) Would be fun to look at. But I suspect > anything beginning with 4 is actually Ultrix-32 which I

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-17 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 23:21, Wayne Sudol via cctech wrote: > > Out of curiosity, is there a reason you do not use Acrobat for creating > pdfs? I have been making PDFs for at least 20 years now, probably more. AFAIK I have _never_ used Acrobat to create them. I print from LibreOffice to its PDF