> On Jan 19, 2024, at 10:34 PM, Rodney Brown wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm not a polymath who keeps lots of Assembly mnemonics in my head, so I
> hoped the "IEEE Standard for Microprocessor Assembly Language" IEEE Std
> 694-1985 1985 doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1985.81632 would have taken off. I think
>
On 17/1/24 02:04, Paul Koning wrote:
On Jan 16, 2024, at 6:52 AM, Rodney Brown via cctalk
wrote:
Forth was ported to an HP-2100 in 1972, by Elizabeth Rather, so had early
history on HP hardware, though from what I can it it was never a product
available from HP.
I don't know if Forth Inc
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:53 AM Rodney Brown via cctalk
wrote:
> Anthony Pepin provided a Forth to the HP3000 Contributed Library in
> September 1982, though I think his looks like a virtual machine, I don't
> remember trying it in the day.
> Thanks to Gavin Scott's "system" and J. David
On 16/01/2024 16:29, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
I suppose it's easier on byte-oriented machines but it seems doable on others. ANSI FORTH may be
helpful for this, since it explicitly distinguishes between "character address" and
"cell address" (meaning word address).
Good point - that
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 10:13 AM, Johan Helsingius via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 16/01/2024 16:04, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>
>> FORTH by its nature actually fits well in Harvard architectures.
>
> Indeed - but it really doesn't fit machines that aren't byte-oriented.
> I started on
On 16/01/2024 16:04, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
FORTH by its nature actually fits well in Harvard architectures.
Indeed - but it really doesn't fit machines that aren't byte-oriented.
I started on porting FIG-FORTH to the PDP-10 architecture but quickly
abandoned the effort...
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 6:52 AM, Rodney Brown via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Forth was ported to an HP-2100 in 1972, by Elizabeth Rather, so had early
> history on HP hardware, though from what I can it it was never a product
> available from HP.
> I don't know if Forth Inc ever supported Forth on HP