On 1/23/23 6:36 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
There's a chance that any existing Reply-To: is overwritten by the
mailing list. -- Maybe I should test that. }:-)
It seems as if the list adds its' self to the Reply-To: header.
"General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
So
On 1/23/23 1:50 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
I've solved this problem with a simple procmail rule:
I did similar.
#
REPLYTO_=`formail -cXCc: | cut -d',' -f1 | sed -e 's/Cc: //' | sed -e
's/\"/\\\"/g'`
0 fw
* ^To:.*classiccmp|^Cc:.*classiccmp
| sed -e 's/\[cctalk\] //g' | forma
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 5:14 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 1/23/23 10:04 AM, Tony Jones via cctalk wrote:
> > The issue is that Gmail filtering isn't great at filtering the list,
> > the way it's setup. A lot of people use it. Clicking to block the
> > sender bl
On 1/23/23 10:04 AM, Tony Jones via cctalk wrote:
The issue is that Gmail filtering isn't great at filtering the list,
the way it's setup. A lot of people use it. Clicking to block the
sender blocks the entire list.
You bring up a valid concern, people filtering the entire list instead
of a
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023, 12:51 AM Christian Corti via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2023, Tony Jones wrote:
> > No but I wish the list was configured differently so From: was the actual
> > sender with a Reply-To of the list. Plus of course ListId:
> >
> > Right now From: is
On Sat, 21 Jan 2023, Tony Jones wrote:
No but I wish the list was configured differently so From: was the actual
sender with a Reply-To of the list. Plus of course ListId:
Right now From: is "sender name via cc talk" which isn't unique since some
people just have a first name. Plus a Cc: sender
On 2023-01-23 01:52, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
On 1/22/23 19:29, Angel M Alganza via cctalk wrote:
This might be a very good thing for the list, if people start trimming
quotes. Please don't try to un-toughen those cookies. :-)
Size had nothing to do with it. Both of mine that wer
On 1/22/23 19:29, Angel M Alganza via cctalk wrote:
On 2023-01-22 23:50, Ali via cctalk wrote:
Since the switchover I am getting more and more of my messages
rejected as suspected SPAM. Anyone else seeing this?
Same here bill. I contacted the new list owner and the response was
pretty much
On 2023-01-22 23:50, Ali via cctalk wrote:
Since the switchover I am getting more and more of my messages
rejected as suspected SPAM. Anyone else seeing this?
Same here bill. I contacted the new list owner and the response was
pretty much tough cookies
This might be a very good thing f
> I'm glad I'm not the only one having rejections. I noticed a resend
> tends to get it onto the list, which seems like a bogus filter (He's a
> spammer, DENY!... Um, he sent it again, I guess not, let it
> through...:-)
>
Jim,
My understanding on this is that the filter is based on IP address
On 1/22/2023 4:52 PM, Adrian Stoness via cctalk wrote:
We hear u loud and clear
On Sun., Jan. 22, 2023, 4:50 p.m. Ali via cctalk,
wrote:
Since the switchover I am getting more and more of my messages
rejected as suspected SPAM. Anyone else seeing this?
bill
Same here bill. I contacted the
We hear u loud and clear
On Sun., Jan. 22, 2023, 4:50 p.m. Ali via cctalk,
wrote:
> > Since the switchover I am getting more and more of my messages
> > rejected as suspected SPAM. Anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > bill
>
> Same here bill. I contacted the new list owner and the response was pret
> Since the switchover I am getting more and more of my messages
> rejected as suspected SPAM. Anyone else seeing this?
>
> bill
Same here bill. I contacted the new list owner and the response was pretty much
tough cookies
-Ali
p.s. It would be interesting to see if this one makes it thro
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023, 10:18 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> Since the switchover I am getting more and more of my messages
> rejected as suspected SPAM. Anyone else seeing this?
>
No but I wish the list was configured differently so From: was the actual
sender w
14 matches
Mail list logo
