11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-22 Thread Rod Smallwood via cctalk
Hi    Well I have had a huge response to my request. I am unsure as to if I have defined the problem properly. So a few bullet points. 1. The objective is to copy RX50 disk images (*.dsk format) to genuine DEC RX50 disks. 2. The PC I want to use is a DEC Celeibris FX ie the PC and its W95

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread Tom Hunter via cctalk
Hi Rod, The "*.dsk" format is just a file extension. What utility created the RX50 disk images? Tom On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:29 AM Rod Smallwood via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Hi > > Well I have had a huge response to my request. > > I am unsure as to if I have defined the

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
I think you're unnecessarily limiting your options by refusing to use Linux, which as we've pointed out is something you can do on your existing PC without overwriting the OS that is on it now. As for SIMH, I am quite convinced that it IS a perfectly good answer. But sure, if you have all the

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread js--- via cctalk
On 2/22/2022 9:29 PM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote: Hi Well I have had a huge response to my request. I am unsure as to if I have defined the problem properly. Rod, you've defined the problem well enough. Have you read the PUTR manual thoroughly? As long as your hardware is OK, PUT

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread Ethan Dicks via cctalk
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:29 PM Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote: > 2. The PC I want to use is a DEC Celeibris FX ie the PC and its W95 > software is as supplied by DEC. . . . > 5. putR was supposed to be able to do this. It does not. Rod, My memory is that programs like putr need to run on "real

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On Feb 23, 2022, at 12:38 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:29 PM Rod Smallwood via cctalk > wrote: >> 2. The PC I want to use is a DEC Celeibris FX ie the PC and its W95 >> software is as supplied by DEC. > . > . > . >> 5. putR was supposed to be able to d

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread js--- via cctalk
On 2/23/2022 12:38 PM, Ethan Dicks via cctalk wrote: Rod, My memory is that programs like putr need to run on "real" DOS, not a DOS window. So if you are trying to run putr without booting to MS-DOS 6.2 or older, that could be the source of your problems with it. He should be able to b

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 2/23/22 09:43, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > I don't know PUTR, but my experience with DOS int13 code in RSTSFLX (built > with DJGPP) is that it worked fine in a DOS window on Win95. And that makes > sense, because Win95 is basically just a bit of UI veneer over DOS. Win NT > is an entir

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread Joshua Rice via cctalk
> On Feb 23, 2022, at 6:04 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk > wrote: > > If running 98 or 95, just do a "shutdown to MS-DOS prompt", rather than > opening a DOS Window and you'll be fine. > > --Chuck > I’ve written RX50’s to generic PC SSDD disks using a DOS window in 98SE. As long as you’re runni

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-23 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
To test the false "Write-protect" error, try: Put a BLANK floppy in the drive, and ask Windoze to FORMAT it. For simplicity, choose the "360K" or "720K" format. See what if any errors that generates. If no errors (or certain specific other ones), then we can assume that the problem is not with t

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-24 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 15:50, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > > I think you're unnecessarily limiting your options by refusing to use Linux, > which as we've pointed out is something you can do on your existing PC > without overwriting the OS that is on it now. I agree. The same thought crossed

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-24 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 19:04, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > Maybe for Win95, but Win98 and later uses its own 32-bit port drivers > (I'm not certain about 95 OSR2). 98 and 98SE are still loaded from DOS and you can shut down and exit to DOS again too, if you know how. There's no functional dif

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-24 Thread Rod Smallwood via cctalk
I already have a Linux system (Ubuntu v20) the problem is I have no hardware that would run Linux and has a floppy controller. However thats no longer a problem as I have obtained a full original MicroRSX distribution on RX50. But thats not the end of the story.  RT-11 is next R On 24/02/2

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-24 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
What version of MicroRSX? Remember RT11 has a limit of 33mb disk partitions, might want to just get 30mb MFM drives and run it off the RQDX3 C On 2/24/2022 5:13 AM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote: I already have a Linux system (Ubuntu v20) the problem is I have no hardware that would run Li

Re: 11/83 operating system load update -2

2022-02-24 Thread Rod Smallwood via cctalk
MicroRSX V1 Partitions - YIK - DU.SYS gets you 8 . SYSGEN more. I have no MFM drives and loads of SCSI. How much of a drive gets used - IDC R On 24/02/2022 11:19, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote: What version of MicroRSX? Remember RT11 has a limit of 33mb disk partitions, might want to just