Before that, I have been using pine (nowadays named alpine), which had
configuration edited via builtin options editor and before that, elm,
never configured by me (AFAIR - about 20yago). So, with this
perspective, I can say mutt is not bad and I intend sticking to it for
a while.
What about mut
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:38:56PM -0800, geneb via cctalk wrote:
> >Before that, I have been using pine (nowadays named alpine), which had
> >configuration edited via builtin options editor and before that, elm,
> >never configured by me (AFAIR - about 20yago). So, with this
> >perspective, I can
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Tomasz Rola via cctalk
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:38:56PM -0800, geneb via cctalk wrote:
>> >Before that, I have been using pine (nowadays named alpine), which had
>> >configuration edited via builtin options editor and before that, elm,
>>
>> What about m
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:49:18PM -0500, Ethan Dicks wrote:
[...]
>
> I've been using web-based MUAs since I switched to Gmail for personal,
> and for many corporate e-mail accounts, including at my present
> employer. I haven't used a textual MUA on UNIX/Linux except 'mail'
> and mutt since abo
