On 04/16/2018 07:23 AM, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> allison via cctalk wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2018 10:25 AM, David Griffith via cctalk wrote:
>>> I'm pondering upgrading the CPU of a Pacccomm Tiny-2 Mk2 radio packet
>>> controller from a 6Mhz Z80 processor and SIO to 10Mhz parts. My
>>> problem is that the
allison via cctalk wrote:
> On 04/15/2018 10:25 AM, David Griffith via cctalk wrote:
> >
> > I'm pondering upgrading the CPU of a Pacccomm Tiny-2 Mk2 radio packet
> > controller from a 6Mhz Z80 processor and SIO to 10Mhz parts. My
> > problem is that the parts already in it appear to be NMOS. Th
On 04/15/2018 05:08 PM, allison via cctalk wrote:
> On 04/15/2018 10:25 AM, David Griffith via cctalk wrote:
>>
>> I'm pondering upgrading the CPU of a Pacccomm Tiny-2 Mk2 radio packet
>> controller from a 6Mhz Z80 processor and SIO to 10Mhz parts. My
>> problem is that the parts already in it app
On 04/15/2018 10:25 AM, David Griffith via cctalk wrote:
>
> I'm pondering upgrading the CPU of a Pacccomm Tiny-2 Mk2 radio packet
> controller from a 6Mhz Z80 processor and SIO to 10Mhz parts. My
> problem is that the parts already in it appear to be NMOS. The family
> is still being made by Zil
On 04/15/2018 07:25 AM, David Griffith via cctalk wrote:
>
> I'm pondering upgrading the CPU of a Pacccomm Tiny-2 Mk2 radio packet
> controller from a 6Mhz Z80 processor and SIO to 10Mhz parts. My problem
> is that the parts already in it appear to be NMOS. The family is still
> being made by Zi
I'm pondering upgrading the CPU of a Pacccomm Tiny-2 Mk2 radio packet
controller from a 6Mhz Z80 processor and SIO to 10Mhz parts. My problem
is that the parts already in it appear to be NMOS. The family is still
being made by Zilog, but for 10Mhz parts, CMOS is all they have. Can I
just d
