ons 2019-08-21 klockan 18:30 +0100 skrev Antonio Carlini via cctalk:
> On 21/08/2019 15:46, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> > I have mixed reactions to it. I use it some, often to see if
> > something is
> > online at all. (If I buy a manual, I usually check, to see if I
> > need to
> > scan it,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:34 PM Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
> >> Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars
> >> on recent eBay KE11-A component board listings, e.g.:
> >>
> >> https://www.ebay.com/itm/372685033144
>
> Must be two such people,
> From: Ethan Dicks
>> Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars
>> on recent eBay KE11-A component board listings, e.g.:
>>
>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/372685033144
> Perhaps someone has a broken KE11-A
Must be two such people, though - I
I was one of the bidders. I have a KE11 backplane and it is populated. I just
wanted some spare boards. You don't see these boards that often.
I am hoping that a backplane would appear too. The seller seems to have some
early pdp11 backplanes.
Paul
>> KE11-A Field Maintenance Print Set >
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:26 AM Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
> > KE11-A Field Maintenance Print Set
> > http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9358
>
> Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars on
> recent eBay KE11-A component board listings, e.g.:
>
>
> KE11-A Field Maintenance Print Set
> http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9358
Speaking of KE11-A's, does anyone know what's behind the bidding wars on
recent eBay KE11-A component board listings, e.g.:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/372685033144
AFAIK, the boards (a complete set is an
> KE11-B Field Maintenance Print Set
> http://manx-docs.org/details.php/1,9361
> the KE11-B I also just found (IIRC, on one of the collections they list
> as indexed).
Oh, speaking of KE11-B's, does anyone have either the Technical or User's manual
for it (I couldn't locate
On 21/08/2019 15:46, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
I have mixed reactions to it. I use it some, often to see if something is
online at all. (If I buy a manual, I usually check, to see if I need to
scan it, and get it to Al. Have a backlog at the moment, sigh.)
The problem is that there are
> They try and list all known DEC manuals and print sets
Ooops, my mistake; the coverage is much wider than that (they default to
DEC). On the home page, there's a pull-down menu labelled "Company",
which lists over 100.
> From: "Paul Birkel"
>> the KE11-B I also just found
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Noel
Chiappa via cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 10:46 AM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Current MANX location
...
KE11-B Field Maintenance Print Set
http
> On Aug 21, 2019, at 7:46 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> So I'd use it as a 'first stop', but don't depend on the negatives to
> be accurate - do a Web seach if it pans out.
In the case of the ALL-IN-1 documentation, it was sort of a “Last Stop”. I’ve
found some at archive.org,
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 9:28 PM, John H. Reinhardt
> wrote:
>>> Anyway... What version of the ADA manuals are you looking for? VSI has
>>> some for an Alpha Version 3.5 that they scraped off the HP site before they
>>> disappeared. I have some older VAX ConDists that might have ADA
>>>
> From: Zane Healy
> What I found really odd was that it had part numbers and manual names
> from one version, but when I clicked on the links it said no known
> version online.
They try and list all known DEC manuals and print sets that ever existed, so
just because something is
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of John H. Reinhardt
> via cctalk
> Sent: 21 August 2019 05:29
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts ;
> Zane Healy
> Subject: Re: Current MANX location
>
> On 8/20/2019 11:26 PM, John H.
On 8/20/2019 11:26 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk wrote:
On 8/20/2019 11:08 PM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
On 8/20/2019 10:37 PM, Zane Healy wrote:
On Aug 20, 2019, at 5:16 PM, John H. Reinhardt via
cctalk wrote:
On 8/20/2019 1:51 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
On Aug 20, 2019, at 11:43
On 8/20/2019 11:08 PM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
On 8/20/2019 10:37 PM, Zane Healy wrote:
On Aug 20, 2019, at 5:16 PM, John H. Reinhardt via
cctalk wrote:
On 8/20/2019 1:51 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
On Aug 20, 2019, at 11:43 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
From: Glen Slick
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 5:16 PM, John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 8/20/2019 1:51 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
>>> On Aug 20, 2019, at 11:43 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
>>> wrote:
>>>
From: Glen Slick
This?
>>> Yes; thanks!
>>>
>>> I don't know it didn't show up in
On 8/20/2019 1:51 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
On Aug 20, 2019, at 11:43 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
From: Glen Slick
This?
Yes; thanks!
I don't know it didn't show up in my Web searches - I tried a number of
different things, no luck.
Also, http://manx.classiccmp.org/ (which
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 11:43 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> From: Glen Slick
>
>> This?
>
> Yes; thanks!
>
> I don't know it didn't show up in my Web searches - I tried a number of
> different things, no luck.
>
>
> Also, http://manx.classiccmp.org/ (which is the medium-old URL
> From: Glen Slick
> This?
Yes; thanks!
I don't know it didn't show up in my Web searches - I tried a number of
different things, no luck.
Also, http://manx.classiccmp.org/ (which is the medium-old URL I had for it)
redirects to something that has no working link to Manx; probably
This?
http://manx-docs.org/
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 12:05 PM Noel Chiappa via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Wasn't MANX supposed to be coming back up after moving? Did that never
> happen?
>
>Noel
>
Wasn't MANX supposed to be coming back up after moving? Did that never happen?
Noel
22 matches
Mail list logo