Re: Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10

2017-10-26 Thread allison via cctalk
On 10/25/17 5:18 PM, Rob Jarratt via cctech wrote: -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Robert Adamson via cctalk Sent: 25 October 2017 20:56 To: cct...@classiccmp.org Subject: Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10 Beginning of the 70

Re: Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10

2017-10-25 Thread Ed via cctalk
cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Robert > Adamson via cctalk > Sent: 25 October 2017 20:56 > To: cct...@classiccmp.org > Subject: Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10 > > Beginning of the 70's I was using a pdp-10 at TSL (Time Sharing Limited, UK) >

RE: Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10

2017-10-25 Thread Rob Jarratt via cctalk
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Robert > Adamson via cctalk > Sent: 25 October 2017 20:56 > To: cct...@classiccmp.org > Subject: Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10 > > Beginning of the 70's I was using

Digression - Ah Yes!! The PDP-10

2017-10-25 Thread Robert Adamson via cctalk
Beginning of the 70's I was using a pdp-10 at TSL (Time Sharing Limited, UK) over a phone line writing logic simulation software in Fortran. Remember it fondly, especially the number of times I needed to redial in and try to reconnect to my session. Still smell the teletype. Cost about £10 for the