> On Oct 15, 2019, at 8:26 PM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> ...
> FYI there is a Burroughs 5500 simulator out there that runs ALGOL just
> fine. Let me know if you want a pointer to the developer.
B5500 simulation is part of the current SIMH.
Apart from that, you can of course run AL
On 10/4/2019 6:43 AM, David via cctalk wrote:
> 1976, UCSD. So I was using your Lisp.
>
> I got a position on the UCSD Pascal project half way through that year
> (reunion in just 2 weeks). So I’m very familiar with the p-code and how all
> that works as well.
>
> In 1978 I discovered Unix on a
On 10/3/2019 1:04 PM, Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:39 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/3/19 9:01 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
>>>
The PDP-6 and KA10 (bas
I wrote:
> Code can be executed from the MMU PAR registers on processors with
> 22-bit addressing (11/23, 11/24, 11/44, 11/70, and J-11 based systems).
>
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 2:25 PM Noel Chiappa via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> My QBUS machine is apart at the moment, so I can't ve
> From: Eric Smith
> Code can be executed from the MMU PAR registers on processors with
> 22-bit addressing (11/23, 11/24, 11/44, 11/70, and J-11 based systems).
My QBUS machine is apart at the moment, so I can't verify this before
posting, but I don't think this hack works on the J-
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:04 PM Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> So does the PDP-11. The 8 registers are mapped to the top 8 words of
> memory so you can do some quite interesting things. It is also possible to
> run a (small) program in only the registers (e.g. no m
At 06:43 AM 10/4/2019, David via cctalk wrote:
>1976, UCSD. So I was using your Lisp.
>
>I got a position on the UCSD Pascal project half way through that year
>(reunion in just 2 weeks). So Iâm very familiar with the p-code and how all
>that works as well.
UCSD Pascal reunion, Saturday Octobe
1976, UCSD. So I was using your Lisp.
I got a position on the UCSD Pascal project half way through that year (reunion
in just 2 weeks). So I’m very familiar with the p-code and how all that works
as well.
In 1978 I discovered Unix on a 780 in the 4th(?) floor lab and made the switch
from Pasca
On 10/1/2019 7:23 PM, Mark Kahrs via cctalk wrote:
The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR and
CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement Register).
If you want to see a tiny implementation then look for the PDP-1
implementation done by L Pete
David...where did you use Lisp on a B6700?
Bill Gord and I wrote the first INTERLISP interpreter for the B6700 back
around
1974-1975, on a DARPA contract, at UCSD. (At the start, it was to
implement BBNLISP,
but the name changed during the project :)
DARPA found that researchers using INTERLISP
Noel wrote:
> The PDP-6 and KA10 (basically a re-implementation of the PDP-6 architecture)
> both had cheapo versions where addresses 0-15 were in main memory, but also
> had an option for real registers, e.g. in the PDP-6: "The Type 162 Fast
> Memory Module contains 16 words with a 0.4 usecond cyc
> On Oct 3, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:39 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/3/19 9:01 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>> The PDP-6 and KA10 (basically a re-implementation of the PDP-6 architecture)
>>> both had
> On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:39 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 10/3/19 9:01 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
>
>> The PDP-6 and KA10 (basically a re-implementation of the PDP-6 architecture)
>> both had cheapo versions where addresses 0-15 were in main memory, but also
>> had an opt
On 10/3/2019 10:01 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> From: Paul Koning
> Some early machines, the PDP-6 I believe is an example, have
> "registers" in the ISA but they actually correspond to specific parts
> of main memory.
The PDP-6 and KA10 (basically a re-implementatio
On 10/3/19 9:01 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
> The PDP-6 and KA10 (basically a re-implementation of the PDP-6 architecture)
> both had cheapo versions where addresses 0-15 were in main memory, but also
> had an option for real registers, e.g. in the PDP-6: "The Type 162 Fast
> Memory Module
> From: Paul Koning
> Some early machines, the PDP-6 I believe is an example, have
> "registers" in the ISA but they actually correspond to specific parts
> of main memory.
The PDP-6 and KA10 (basically a re-implementation of the PDP-6 architecture)
both had cheapo versions where
ons 2019-10-02 klockan 19:02 + skrev Rich Alderson via cctalk:
> From: Mark Kahrs
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 7:24 PM
>
> > The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence
> > CAR and
> > CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement
> > Register).
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2019, at 3:02 PM, Rich Alderson via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> From: Mark Kahrs
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 7:24 PM
>
>> The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR and
>> CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement Register).
>
> In t
Thanks for that bit of historical information. Things always make more sense in
context. When I learned lisp on a B6700 it was hard to understand and harder to
program. With this bit of context lisp now makes a lot more sense, and looking
back if I knew this then I’m sure I would have grasped th
From: Mark Kahrs
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 7:24 PM
> The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR and
> CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement Register).
In the 70x series of IBM scientific systems (704, 709, 7040, 7090, 7044, 7094),
the word
13:36 (GMT-07:00) To: Lars
Brinkhoff , "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
, Bill Degnan via cctech Cc:
Bill Degnan Subject: Re: LISP implementations on small
machines Hello List -That jives with a conversation I had with John McCarthy
before he died.He said t
13:36 (GMT-07:00) To: Lars
Brinkhoff , "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
, Bill Degnan via cctech Cc:
Bill Degnan Subject: Re: LISP implementations on small
machines Hello List -That jives with a conversation I had with John McCarthy
before he died.He said t
: Bill Degnan via
cctech Cc: Bill Degnan Subject:
Re: LISP implementations on small machines Bill Degnan wrote:> First full
version 7090 and then a version was ported tot he PDP-1> that was less
powerful. This is straight from the LISP manual on> site.Which LISP manual is
that?T
: Bill Degnan via
cctech Cc: Bill Degnan Subject:
Re: LISP implementations on small machines Bill Degnan wrote:> First full
version 7090 and then a version was ported tot he PDP-1> that was less
powerful. This is straight from the LISP manual on> site.Which LISP manual is
that?T
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:39 AM Lars Brinkhoff via cctech <
cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Mark Kahrs wrote:
> > The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR
> > and CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement
> > Register).
>
> Or was it an IBM 704?
>
Bill Degnan wrote:
> First full version 7090 and then a version was ported tot he PDP-1
> that was less powerful. This is straight from the LISP manual on
> site.
Which LISP manual is that?
The LISP I Programmer's Manual from 1960 says IBM 704. It also says "a
version of LISP I is being prepare
The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR and
CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement Register).
If you want to see a tiny implementation then look for the PDP-1
implementation done by L Peter Deutsch. There's a book chapter and then I
found this
Mark Kahrs wrote:
> The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR
> and CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement
> Register).
Or was it an IBM 704?
28 matches
Mail list logo
