On 02/08/2016 06:55 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
As a matter of interest I've checked the MC146818 datasheet and it
claims a 50µA current draw in the usual configuration with a 32768Hz
oscillator.
Yup. And things have only gotten better with time. I suspect that you
could power the '818
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> You're talking about RTC and perhaps a bit of static RAM maintenance. If this
> RTC unit is like most of the same era, the operating voltage range is quite
> wide (probably about 2-7V) and sub-1ma current draw. Chargers for this type of
> application are
, February 8, 2016 6:55 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: NiCd battery replacement in vintage computers
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> You're talking about RTC and perhaps a bit of static RAM maintenance. If this
> RTC unit is like mo
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 07:08 , dwight wrote:
>
> Make sure to neutralize the leaked alkaline stuff from the cells.
> Just a simple cleaning isn't enough. I use white vinegar.
I physically removed the affected area down to bare copper and fiberglass:
I found a reference which states that the NVRAM is used to hold SCSI controller
parameters.
I decided to mount a CR123A holder inside the case on one of the slot filler
panels. I had some through-hole PCB mount CR123A holders left over from a
previous project. I machined a mounting base for
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
>
> Today I discovered that I hadn't replaced the NiCd battery in time in my
> Amiga 3000. Pictures:
> ...
> While I begin to figure out how I'd like to perform this repair, I'm curious
> about what others have decided to do in
Today I discovered that I hadn't replaced the NiCd battery in time in my Amiga
3000. Pictures:
https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696042894939979776
https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696050264306921472
https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696065578977472512
It's a fairly typical 3.6V 60mAH 3-cell NiCd
On 2016-Feb-06, at 1:21 PM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
> Today I discovered that I hadn't replaced the NiCd battery in time in my
> Amiga 3000. Pictures:
>
> https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696042894939979776
> https://twitter.com/nf6x/status/696050264306921472
>
On 02/06/2016 1:29 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
On Feb 6, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
Today I discovered that I hadn't replaced the NiCd battery in time in my Amiga
3000. Pictures:
...
While I begin to figure out how I'd like to perform this repair, I'm curious
about what
On 02/06/2016 1:29 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
On Feb 6, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
Today I discovered that I hadn't replaced the NiCd battery in time in my Amiga
3000. Pictures:
...
While I begin to figure out how I'd like to perform this repair, I'm curious
about what
In this Amiga, the battery is just for a real time clock. I don't think the
A3000 saves any parameters in nonvolatile memory.
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > I see all the talk about NiCd cells--does no one use NiMH nowadays?
> > Why go with the toxics?
>
> Voltage? Recharging circuits? Current sinking capacity. It's not
> always a 1:1 mapping.
Sure, but does it really matter in a typical
On 02/06/2016 05:05 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
Voltage? Recharging circuits? Current sinking capacity. It's not
always a 1:1 mapping.
You're talking about RTC and perhaps a bit of static RAM maintenance.
If this RTC unit is like most of the same era, the operating voltage
range is
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 16:59, Chris Pye wrote:
> This is what I normally do, preferably mounted away from the board. Generally
> you can get away with simply using a diode to prevent the circuit trying to
> charge the battery.
I think that a blocking diode added in the
> On 7 Feb 2016, at 7:21 am, Mark J. Blair wrote:
>
> * Reconfigure the circuit to use a non-rechargeable lithium coin cell in a
> holder instead. I don't think I've seen one of those leak before.
This is what I normally do, preferably mounted away from the board. Generally
I see all the talk about NiCd cells--does no one use NiMH nowadays? Why
go with the toxics?
--Chuck
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
> I see all the talk about NiCd cells--does no one use NiMH nowadays? Why go
> with the toxics?
Voltage? Recharging circuits? Current sinking capacity. It's not always a
1:1 mapping.
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
>> Voltage? Recharging circuits? Current sinking capacity. It's not
>> always a 1:1 mapping.
>
> Sure, but does it really matter in a typical battery-backed-up RAM or RTC
> application seen in computers? I
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 19:18, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
> If you're not interested in a "authentic" look, a plain old lithium primary
> coin cell or two, with a blocking diode in this circuit should work for years.
I might tuck a CR123 in a holder inside the case somewhere, with a
19 matches
Mail list logo