Can anyone tell what kind of computer this might have been connected to?
https://i.imgur.com/IC3AVCf.jpg
I googled MS8192X26-1.9-RT and found one hit:
http://www.nsn-now.com/Indexing/ViewDetail.aspx?QString=7025013480747
And then FABRI-TECH (maybe miss-spelled) gave a nice broschure:
https://a
On 05/05/2018 04:57 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
Can anyone tell what kind of computer this might have been connected to?
https://i.imgur.com/IC3AVCf.jpg
The panel just SCREAMS military. A lot of outfits
(CDC,Burroughs, IBM, Honeywell) made systems for the
military. Likely, the back of
2018-05-05 17:20 GMT+02:00 Jon Elson :
> On 05/05/2018 04:57 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell what kind of computer this might have been connected to?
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/IC3AVCf.jpg
>>
>> The panel just SCREAMS military. A lot of outfits (CDC,Burroughs, IBM,
> Honeywe
On 5/5/18 8:57 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
> I found one more google hit for FABRI-TEK:
> http://ljkrakauer.com/LJK/60s/moby.htm Interfacing it with a PDP-6.
There should be a bunch of info on the net, Fabri-Tek made a LOT of OEM
core memory units. I have one for a PDP-8/I
Also, that li
On 2018-May-05, at 2:57 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
> Can anyone tell what kind of computer this might have been connected to?
>
> https://i.imgur.com/IC3AVCf.jpg
>
> I googled MS8192X26-1.9-RT and found one hit:
>
> http://www.nsn-now.com/Indexing/ViewDetail.aspx?QString=7025013480747
>
On 05/05/2018 04:57 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
It could be flight control related since it is aviation museum that
currently have it.
Hmm, 'stack heater' caught my eye... I'm not particularly familiar with
core setups, but I didn't think that was a common thing, suggesting the
possibil
Just found a better picture of the MIT PDP-6 core panel
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mwichary/2323461568
The contents of the fortune cookie was still taped on there as of 2008
> On 5/5/18 8:57 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
>
>> I found one more google hit for FABRI-TEK:
>> http://ljkrak
Core temp was a big issue even in commercial environments. You didn't see
it temp but you would see core [driver] current.
My 360/50 panel has the ability to monitor and adjust in real time the core
current.
Military or extreme environment core was a bitch to keep working. I worked
on a system de
On 5/5/2018 10:23 AM, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote:
Core temp was a big issue even in commercial environments. You didn't see
it temp but you would see core [driver] current.
My 360/50 panel has the ability to monitor and adjust in real time the core
current.
Military or extreme environment
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Pete Lancashire via cctalk
wrote:
> Core temp was a big issue even in commercial environments. You didn't see
> it temp but you would see core [driver] current.
Every DEC corestack I've seen at least has a thermistor to handle the
normal range of operational temps.
On 05/05/2018 10:23 AM, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote:
> Core temp was a big issue even in commercial environments. You didn't see
> it temp but you would see core [driver] current.
The early IBM 7000 series (7070, 7080, 7090) kept core in a
temperature-regulated oil bath. Later versions used
SDS built a 24 bit system with Parity too, the CDC 924 was 24bit,
there were a few others and I believe but can not recall for sure, a
navy 24 bit maybe done by ERA.
bb
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
wrote:
> On 05/05/2018 10:23 AM, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote:
>> Co
On 05/05/2018 11:50 AM, Jules Richardson via cctalk wrote:
On 05/05/2018 04:57 AM, Mattis Lind via cctalk wrote:
It could be flight control related since it is aviation
museum that
currently have it.
Hmm, 'stack heater' caught my eye... I'm not particularly
familiar with core setups, but I d
wight
From: cctalk on behalf of Bob Smith via cctalk
Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2018 12:36:07 PM
To: Chuck Guzis; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Old core memory system.
SDS built a 24 bit system with Parity too, the CDC 924 was 24bit,
there
> On May 5, 2018, at 2:32 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 05/05/2018 10:23 AM, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote:
>> Core temp was a big issue even in commercial environments. You didn't see
>> it temp but you would see core [driver] current.
>
> The early IBM 7000 series (7070, 708
On 5/6/2018 1:19 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>
>
>> On May 5, 2018, at 2:32 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/05/2018 10:23 AM, Pete Lancashire via cctalk wrote:
>>> Core temp was a big issue even in commercial environments. You didn't see
>>> it temp but you would see core
My 360/65 panel has the control panel for Fabri-Tek add-on memory on the left
side.
http://www.myimagecollection.com/webpics/65panel.jpg
17 matches
Mail list logo