Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-19 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 19:24, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > > On 11/18/19 11:10 AM, Paul Koning wrote: > > > For example, I'm not sure anyone would call VMS an open system, yet > > clearly it's distributed (VAXcluster). > > What is "open" in this context? Is it open source? Is it open >

Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-18 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk
On 11/18/19 11:24 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: not really, all it meant was there was some intelligence at the terminal it wasn't capable of any sort of user-programmable computation Okay. Sounds like distributed is just a term collision then. Thank you for the clarification. that

Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-18 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
On 11/18/19 10:04 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > Does the "Distributed" in "Distributed Function Terminal" refer to / mean the > same thing as the "Distributed" in > "Distributed Systems", which are also known as "Open Systems"? not really, all it meant was there was some intelligence

Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-18 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk
On 11/18/19 11:10 AM, Paul Koning wrote: Open systems may be distributed, distributed systems may be open, but they are not synonyms. Okay. Fair enough. I don't think the people using "Open Systems" as in Mainframe vs Open Systems vs Wintel were differentiating between "open" vs

Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-18 Thread dwight via cctalk
An interesting article but he never mentioned cost. Using TV available components cut cost. Dwight From: cctalk on behalf of Grant Taylor via cctalk Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 10:04 AM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Question about "Distri

Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-18 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk
On 11/18/19 10:37 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: odd message.. no body.. *facepalm* Operator error. - Multiple messages trying to start a new thread instead of polluting another thread. Let's try this again. On 11/18/19 9:47 AM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk wrote: I am no expert on the CUT

Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-18 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
odd message.. no body.. first generation displays were very dumb, later generations were intelligent and could parse the data stream allowing the creation of multiple virtual displays along with graphics. these are the ones with a 25th status row Ken just wrote a blog post about this trying to

Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.

2019-11-18 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk
On 11/18/19 9:47 AM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk wrote: -- Grant. . . . unix || die