On Nov 2, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Electronics Plus wrote:
>
> Memory
> User-installable RAM boards provide the 425 with RAM in increments of 8, 16
> From
> http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/hp/9000_400/A2100-90600_HP_9000_425_Owners_Guide_Aug91.pdf
>
>
-Original Message-
I sure wish someone had a an HP-Apollo 9000/400 series hardware reference with
RAM board pinouts, whether scanned or in print…
-- Chris
Memory
User-installable RAM boards provide the 425 with RAM in increments of 8, 16
and 32 Mbyte blocks. They have an Error
On Nov 2, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
> I bought a VME10 keyboard from them about 6 months ago
> then the rest finally showed up a week or two ago, so now I have a complete
> one
> with color monitor.
Glad to see you got that, I was kind of bothered by the listing of the
tor 2018-11-01 klockan 14:36 -0700 skrev Al Kossow via cctalk:
> Wondering if this is an IBM Xstation 140 with token ring
>
> Wonder what processor it uses..
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/273538296972
>
The seller has a seagate 4038 (ST-412) disk for sale.
On 11/2/18 4:56 AM, emanuel stiebler wrote:
> So is this thing on ebay the 140? Probably would bite, still have the
> Eval Board for the R33020 and manuals somewhere ...
>
yes.
I just bought an NCD19 from them, now I'm trying to find NCDware old enough
to support it (it has a 68020). They
On 2018-11-01 18:29, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> On 11/1/18 3:13 PM, Kevin Bowling via cctalk wrote:
>
>>140 CPU Planar 33 MHz LSI R33020 193-273
>
> http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohlandl/RS6000/193-273.txt
So is this thing on ebay the 140? Probably would bite, still have the
Eval Board for
On 11/1/18 3:13 PM, Kevin Bowling via cctalk wrote:
>140 CPU Planar 33 MHz LSI R33020 193-273
http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohlandl/RS6000/193-273.txt
7010 Xstation
120 CPU Planar 8 MHz 80186 190-027-1
130 CPU Planar 12.5 MHz 80C186 190-027
140 CPU Planar 33 MHz LSI R33020 193-273
150 CPU Planar Motorola 88110 193-018
160 CPU Planar 66 MHz PowerPC 603 195-027
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:51 PM Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk
wrote:
>
>
The 120 also used a 34010 to handle the graphics, I think? It has been
a long time...
--
Will
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:51 PM Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk
wrote:
>
> If I recall correctly the Xstation 120 (the first of them) used an 8086
> (might have been an 80186). The big issue was that you
RISC @ 33MHZ
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:51 PM Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> If I recall correctly the Xstation 120 (the first of them) used an 8086
> (might have been an 80186). The big issue was that you couldn’t do
> anything with it because what was in
If I recall correctly the Xstation 120 (the first of them) used an 8086 (might
have been an 80186). The big issue was that you couldn’t do anything with it
because what was in ROM/FLASH was only smart enough to be able to TFTP the rest
of the microcode (not terribly useful if you don’t have
11 matches
Mail list logo