On 2015-Oct-25, at 8:29 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 10/24/2015 08:54 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
>> For reasons too abstruse to explain in detail I'm on the lookout for
>> terminals that are, physically, really small - especially serial and
>> coax 3270, and possibly twinax 5250.
>>
>>
> I had a thing tha
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jon Elson
> Sent: 26 October 2015 19:09
> To: gene...@classiccmp.org; discuss...@classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-
> Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Oddball question: really small termi
On 10/25/2015 08:32 PM, william degnan wrote:
On Oct 25, 2015 8:54 PM, "Jon Elson" wrote:
On 10/25/2015 05:27 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
A pull-out keyboard in the base? I have one too. Would be perfect if
it worked, and I had half a dozen of them!
No, mine did NOT have a pull-out or fold-down k
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
>
> Well I had forgotten I had pretty much what I was looking for in the
> Corestore collection already!
>
> http://www.corestore.org/terms.jpg
>
> Two terminals the size of small pizza boxes using external VGA
> displays. On top, an IBM 3483 coax
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:19 AM, tony duell wrote:
> [HP Palmtops, 95LX etc]
>> Oh those look pretty good; I love the terminal emulator in ROM;
>> doesn't even need an OS, switch it on and it works; that's one of the
>> things I'm after. Shame about the rather nasty looking monochrome LCD
>
> Actu
"physically really small" means different things to different people. It
45 years ago, a "mini-computer" was considered to be "really small". So
small that they gave it a special name to refer to how tiny it was.
Sony tried to call their Vaio "ultra-portable",
which was rather laughable whe
On Oct 25, 2015 8:54 PM, "Jon Elson" wrote:
>
> On 10/25/2015 05:27 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
>>
>>
>> A pull-out keyboard in the base? I have one too. Would be perfect if
>> it worked, and I had half a dozen of them!
>>
>>
> No, mine did NOT have a pull-out or fold-down kbd, it was all one piece,
like
On 10/25/2015 05:27 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
A pull-out keyboard in the base? I have one too. Would be perfect if
it worked, and I had half a dozen of them!
No, mine did NOT have a pull-out or fold-down kbd, it was
all one piece, like a micro-miniaturized ADM3 or similar
terminal. Possibly it W
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 10/24/2015 08:54 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
>>
>> For reasons too abstruse to explain in detail I'm on the lookout for
>> terminals that are, physically, really small - especially serial and
>> coax 3270, and possibly twinax 5250.
>>
>>
> I had a th
> > For reasons too abstruse to explain in detail I'm on the lookout for
> > terminals that are, physically, really small - especially serial and
> > coax 3270, and possibly twinax 5250.
How small is "really small"? IBM made a terminal with a 5" screen for the 4704
banking systems. http://frente
I wonder if - http://www.brielcomputers.com/wordpress/?cat=25
can be hacked to do Baudot at 60 wpm?
Ed#
In a message dated 10/25/2015 7:29:19 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
tmfdm...@gmail.com writes:
These are the best bet I've seen for serial terminals so far:
http://www.brielcompu
On 10/24/2015 08:54 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
For reasons too abstruse to explain in detail I'm on the lookout for
terminals that are, physically, really small - especially serial and
coax 3270, and possibly twinax 5250.
I had a thing that was apparently used in France and maybe
Canada for telephon
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:19 AM, tony duell wrote:
> [HP Palmtops, 95LX etc]
>> Oh those look pretty good; I love the terminal emulator in ROM;
>> doesn't even need an OS, switch it on and it works; that's one of the
>> things I'm after. Shame about the rather nasty looking monochrome LCD
>
> Actu
[HP Palmtops, 95LX etc]
> Oh those look pretty good; I love the terminal emulator in ROM;
> doesn't even need an OS, switch it on and it works; that's one of the
> things I'm after. Shame about the rather nasty looking monochrome LCD
Actually, there is an OS -- MS-DOS -- and it's in ROM too. Along
We used to used a TRS-80 model 100 as a terminal too. sometimes I would
put a 50 ft cable on it and hook it to the hp2000 or the hp3000! Ed#
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Mike Ross
> Sent: 25 October 2015 09:19
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: Oddball question: really small terminals
>
> On Sun, Oct 2
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:36 PM, tony duell wrote:
>>
>> For reasons too abstruse to explain in detail I'm on the lookout for
>> terminals that are, physically, really small - especially serial and
>> coax 3270, and possibly twinax 5250.
>>
>> Yes you could do things with small laptops and PDAs wi
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
>
> This is along the right lines, although it's a TCP/IP network device
> without serial or 3270 ports for direct connection, and it doesn't
> have a screen:
>
> http://www.axel.com/uk/id_M75.html
>
I have a couple of AX3000 M75. I'm pretty sure
>
> For reasons too abstruse to explain in detail I'm on the lookout for
> terminals that are, physically, really small - especially serial and
> coax 3270, and possibly twinax 5250.
>
> Yes you could do things with small laptops and PDAs with PCMCIA cards
> and adapters and software - I know a gu
I think you want a Minec 1000. but it's a very rare beast. It
talks 3270 and VT100.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/zachetus/535850501/
/P
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 02:54:41PM +1300, Mike Ross wrote:
> For reasons too abstruse to explain in detail I'm on the lookout for
> terminals that are, physic
On Oct 24, 2015 8:54 PM, "Mike Ross" wrote:
> But really I'd prefer a compact all-in one solution; a one-piece
> terminal. Any suggestions? I'm open to both LCDs and *small* CRTs.
> Preferably colour!
>
First thing that comes to mind are the Informer terminals. They had them
in small CRT versio
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Cindy Croxton wrote:
> How small is "really small"? IBM made a terminal with a 5" screen for the
> 4704 banking systems. http://frente-cajas.blogspot.com/
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Mike Ross
yes we have one line LED letter terminals used for Deaf and hard of
Hearing.
we will buy more of them too. do you have any of them?
ASCII or BAUDOT either for our Deaf Telecom diaplay.
Drop me a line offlist thanks Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC
In a message dated 10/24/2015 8:44:59
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Alexandre Souza <
alexandre.tabaj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 16 char x 1 line is small enough? :)
> Em 25/10/2015 01:34, "Chuck Guzis" escreveu:
>
> > On 10/24/2015 08:10 PM, Cindy Croxton wrote:
> >
> >> How small is "really small"? IBM made a terminal with a 5" scre
16 char x 1 line is small enough? :)
Em 25/10/2015 01:34, "Chuck Guzis" escreveu:
> On 10/24/2015 08:10 PM, Cindy Croxton wrote:
>
>> How small is "really small"? IBM made a terminal with a 5" screen for
>> the 4704 banking systems. http://frente-cajas.blogspot.com/
>>
>
> I've got one with a 64
The Epson RC-20 wrist watch (30 years ago) had serial port, RAM, ROM,
and sort of a Z80.
But, nobody ever brought up CP/M on it.
On 10/24/2015 08:10 PM, Cindy Croxton wrote:
How small is "really small"? IBM made a terminal with a 5" screen for
the 4704 banking systems. http://frente-cajas.blogspot.com/
I've got one with a 64 character 1-line LED display. Is that small enough?
--Chuck
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Cindy Croxton wrote:
How small is "really small"? IBM made a terminal with a 5" screen for
the 4704 banking systems. http://frente-cajas.blogspot.com/
And the Atari Portfolio runs a version of DR-DOS.
And the Poqet ran MS-DOS.
Both have serial ports available.
Both will ru
How small is "really small"? IBM made a terminal with a 5" screen for the 4704
banking systems. http://frente-cajas.blogspot.com/
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Mike Ross
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 8:55 PM
To: General Discussion:
29 matches
Mail list logo
