well I save the tiff because that's what archivists do
generally I end up using the jpeg to make picture from. or post to
net!
In a message dated 2/19/2017 4:25:48 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
t...@telegraphics.com.au writes:
On 2017-02-19 3:50 PM, couryho...@aol.com
On 2017-02-19 3:44 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Toby Thain
> Often the source material is a multipage TIFF from the scanner or other
> processing step.
Multiple single-page TIFFs, in my case.
Tiffcp and tiffsplit go between these, so I don't bother making a
distinction... I fi
On 2017-02-19 3:50 PM, couryho...@aol.com wrote:
When we scan stuff at SMECC
it is saved in the following 3 formats for each item scanned.
PDF with ocr background
TIFF
JPEG
and if containing a lot of text a TXT file as well.
Kind of a shotgun approach... but should stand test
When we scan stuff at SMECC
it is saved in the following 3 formats for each item scanned.
PDF with ocr background
TIFF
JPEG
and if containing a lot of text a TXT file as well.
Kind of a shotgun approach... but should stand test of time?
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.sm
> From: Toby Thain
> Often the source material is a multipage TIFF from the scanner or other
> processing step.
Multiple single-page TIFFs, in my case.
> So relevant tools are things like tiff2pdf (tiffutils)
But also JPEG's, for pages where the B+W scanning I use (with fax comp
In a message dated 2/19/2017 8:06:50 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
mo...@rodents-montreal.org writes:
> - PDF/A is [...]
> Those are all good archival properties! However, it's also R/O.
Maybe if you stick to Adobe's tools. As demonstrated by this thread,
it's entirely possible to mo
/Nico
- Original Message -
From: Paul Birkel
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU
later version
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Mouse
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:07 AM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU
later version
> - PDF/A is [...]
> Those are al
> - PDF/A is [...]
> Those are all good archival properties! However, it's also R/O.
Maybe if you stick to Adobe's tools. As demonstrated by this thread,
it's entirely possible to modify such files, even if the currently-easy
ways to do that involve a trip through a completely different
repres
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob
Rosenbloom
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:37 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version
On 2/18/2017 10:29 AM, Paul Birkel wrote
.. Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU
later version
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck
Guzis
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 4:04 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which i
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Guzis
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 4:04 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU
later version
On 02/18
> From: Al Kossow
> PDF-A
Sorry, what's the issue with PDF/A?
Since it's supposedly the 'archival' version, that's what I asked for; I
wanted to maximize the lifetime of these things.
What version of PDF should I be asking for? (I'm not doing the PDF'ing. The
person who is is using Acro
On 02/18/2017 11:24 AM, couryho...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Adobe claims " PDF/A – the ISO standard for long-term archiving"
>
> -I am confused about all the versions etc..
> -which are good which are bad?
> -are there good programs for opening hesitant to open pdf file?
> - what is a goo
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al
Kossow
>> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM
>> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
>> Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version
>>
>> PDF-A
>>
>> which is the reason it's not on bitsavers
> Thank you Al. It's
On 2/18/2017 10:29 AM, Paul Birkel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob
Rosenbloom
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:24 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version
On 2/18
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob
Rosenbloom
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:24 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version
On 2/18/2017 10:04 AM, Paul Birkel wrote
On 2/18/2017 10:04 AM, Paul Birkel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version
PDF-A
which is the reason it's n
>-Original Message-
>From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow
>Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM
>To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version
>
>PDF-A
>
>which is the reason it's not on bi
PDF-A
which is the reason it's not on bitsavers
On 2/18/17 9:48 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
> On 2017-02-18 12:44 PM, Paul Birkel wrote:
>> Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<.
>> In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so
>> that it's searchabl
On 2017-02-18 12:44 PM, Paul Birkel wrote:
Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<.
In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so
that it's searchable?
Unlocked?!?!?!?!
Sounds like yet another reason to publish multipage TIFF instead of or
in
Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<.
In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so
that it's searchable?
Should I infer that you purchased that $399 load of DEC modules?
I debated, what with the J11 processor, but no FP-coprocessor and no
docu
The M7133 is etch D or earlier. The M7133-YA is rev E or later.
I'll put it on my look for list.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Noel Chiappa
wrote:
> So I was recently provided (thanks!) with a copy of the later rev of the
> PDP-11/24 Tech Manual (EK-11024-TM-003), which I have had scanned f
23 matches
Mail list logo