Re: Re: 34 pin Card Edge “Male to Male” Connector

2018-11-29 Thread Eric Smith via cctalk
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 6:01 PM William Sudbrink via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > 1) how do you specify the slightly beveled edge required for easy > insertion? > 2) is there some way to specify "hardened" or whatever plating for the > connector traces? > Those have to be specified "o

RE: Re: 34 pin Card Edge “Male to Male” Connector

2018-11-28 Thread William Sudbrink via cctalk
I'm not sure you're quite getting it... they say a picture is worth a thousand words: http://wsudbrink.dyndns.org:8080/images/20181128_194316.jpg Assuming I make up some gerbers myself, two questions: 1) how do you specify the slightly beveled edge required for easy insertion? 2) is there some

Re: Re: 34 pin Card Edge “Male to Male” Connector

2018-11-28 Thread Eric Smith via cctalk
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:55 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: > In the late 1970's in the TRS80 world, there were MALE 34 pin card edge > ribbon cable connectors! with gold plated fingers! (used on a short > extension for drives in enclosures, and to convert expansion interface > connections to g

Re: Re: 34 pin Card Edge “Male to Male” Connector

2018-11-28 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
Are the adapters from dual row header to card edge wtill available? (They were used to connect a 3.5" drive to a 5.25" drive cable) Could you put two of those back to back connected by a header? In the late 1970's in the TRS80 world, there were MALE 34 pin card edge ribbon cable connectors! wit