Fantastic idea. I don't know how if it would work with our small community, but
when it comes to contemporary programming, it works wonders. There is most
always someone that has a solution for the most arcane language syntax or
compiler bug out there. I'll be joining.
Marc
> On Jan 15, 2016,
On 01/15/2016 07:36 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
In Italy even:
http://www.ebay.it/itm/Vintage-Bunker-Ramo-Corp-Telequote-III-Display-Station-Assembly-549211-Manual-/161829917688
I wonder if my modem may have been part of a Telequote
installation.
There wasn't a whole lot in the display units--m
On 2016-Jan-15, at 4:58 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 01/15/2016 04:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing: are you mentioning BR here in relation to stock
>> exchanges - were they a major supplier for stock exchange data
>> services?
>
> Oh yes--look up "Telequote". I think that CHM has a
On Jan 15, 2016 7:58 PM, "Chuck Guzis" wrote:
>
> On 01/15/2016 04:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing: are you mentioning BR here in relation to stock
>> exchanges - were they a major supplier for stock exchange data
>> services?
>
>
> Oh yes--look up "Telequote". I think that CHM has
On 01/15/2016 04:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
I'm guessing: are you mentioning BR here in relation to stock
exchanges - were they a major supplier for stock exchange data
services?
Oh yes--look up "Telequote". I think that CHM has a few bits as well.
A lot of caselaw was tied up in Telequote,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
>
> On 2016-Jan-15, at 4:12 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> > Ah, old eyes!
> >
> > I originally read the title of the thread as "Retrocomputing on Stock
> Excahange".
> >
> > So, does anyone collect Bunker-Ramo gear here?
> >
> > Just curious,
> > C
On 2016-Jan-15, at 4:12 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> Ah, old eyes!
>
> I originally read the title of the thread as "Retrocomputing on Stock
> Excahange".
>
> So, does anyone collect Bunker-Ramo gear here?
>
> Just curious,
> Chuck
Well, collecting Bunker-Ramo stuff as an objective would be over
Ah, old eyes!
I originally read the title of the thread as "Retrocomputing on Stock
Excahange".
So, does anyone collect Bunker-Ramo gear here?
Just curious,
Chuck
> -Original Message-
> From: cctech [mailto:cctech-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Charles
> Anthony
> Sent: 15 January 2016 16:58
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:22 AM,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:22 AM, geneb wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> On 15 January 2016 at 13:50, geneb wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/retro-computing
>>>
>>> I think this is actually a pretty good idea and StackExchange is a great
>>>
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, David Brownlee wrote:
On 15 January 2016 at 13:50, geneb wrote:
http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/retro-computing
I think this is actually a pretty good idea and StackExchange is a great
platform.
As of right now it needs 11 more people following it (and
On 15 January 2016 at 13:50, geneb wrote:
>
> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/retro-computing
>
> I think this is actually a pretty good idea and StackExchange is a great
> platform.
>
> As of right now it needs 11 more people following it (and more questions).
It might be good t
12 matches
Mail list logo
