> On May 31, 2021, at 1:55 PM, Antonio Carlini wrote:
>
> On 31/05/2021 15:04, Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>> The earlier rule was that the first number is the major version, the letter
>> is the minor version. As of V7 it changed to major number dot minor number.
>> In either case, the dash nu
On 31/05/2021 15:04, Paul Koning wrote:
The earlier rule was that the first number is the major version, the letter is
the minor version. As of V7 it changed to major number dot minor number. In
either case, the dash number suffix is the baselevel number (development build
cycle number). T
> On May 31, 2021, at 10:04 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 31, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Antonio Carlini via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can someone explain RSTS/E version numbers to me?
>>
>> They seem to be all over the pla
> On May 31, 2021, at 8:06 AM, Antonio Carlini via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Can someone explain RSTS/E version numbers to me?
>
> They seem to be all over the place: V2A-19, V4A-12, V4B-17, V5A-21, V5B-24,
> V5C-01, V6A-02, V6B-02, V6C-03.
>
> Then it seems to h
Can someone explain RSTS/E version numbers to me?
They seem to be all over the place: V2A-19, V4A-12, V4B-17, V5A-21,
V5B-24, V5C-01, V6A-02, V6B-02, V6C-03.
Then it seems to have switched scheme but the "-number" suffix
reappears: V7.0, V7.2, V8.0-06.
Any clarification would
