Il giorno mer, 06/04/2016 alle 21.59 +0200, supervinx ha scritto:
> Ah, sad and bad news...
> Transferred ICP.TSK as usual and checked it with DMP (between simh and
> the MicroPDP).
> Gave it a try, but got a system crash.
> I suspect that the Indirect Command Processor is tightly linked with the
>
> Another curious thing is this...
> Dumping the first block with DMP or a Linux/DOS tools gives different
> results.
> For example:
> DMP
> ===
> B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16
> Linux/DOS
> =
> B16 B15 B14 B13 B12 B11 B10 B9 B8 B7 B6 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1
> Byte se
Ah, sad and bad news...
Transferred ICP.TSK as usual and checked it with DMP (between simh and
the MicroPDP).
Gave it a try, but got a system crash.
I suspect that the Indirect Command Processor is tightly linked with the
kernel...
Another curious thing is this...
Dumping the first block with DMP
>> The closest RSX11M (not Plus) distribution I can find is an RL01
>> distribution of RSX11M V4.1
>> Since it is disk and not tape it can be directly booted with Simh and it
>> does have a ICP.TSK
>> that should be pretty compatible with V4.2 since it is from V4.1 Baseline.
>> You can fi
> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:44:26 +0200
> From: supervinx
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>
> Subject: Re: R: RE: RSX-11M trouble
> Message-ID: <1459795466.2891.10.camel@PIV-Ubuntu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Mark Matlock wrote:
>
>The closest RSX11M (not Plus) distribution I can find is an RL01
> distribution of RSX11M V4.1
> Since it is disk and not tape it can be directly booted with Simh and it does
> have a ICP.TSK
> that should be pretty compatible with V4.2
Il giorno dom, 03/04/2016 alle 19.33 +0200, supervinx ha scritto:
> Il giorno dom, 03/04/2016 alle 14.59 +0200, supervinx ha scritto:
> > Hmmm RSX-11Mplus 4.2 aren't recognized as TSK images by "normal" 4.2
> Well... the files have been correctly transferred... i did a DMP on both
> sides
> so
Il giorno dom, 03/04/2016 alle 14.59 +0200, supervinx ha scritto:
> Hmmm RSX-11Mplus 4.2 aren't recognized as TSK images by "normal" 4.2
Well... the files have been correctly transferred... i did a DMP on both
sides
so definitely I need a 4.2 non plus.
On Sun, April 3, 2016 09:01, supervinx wrote:
> Well..
> The RSXM70.dsk has many TSKs not built.
> How can I build them?
>
>
A standard RSX-11m distribution in a so called 'Baseline' system which
boots an nearly all PDP-11's and is a very basic system.
Normally you do a sysgen to build a target
Hmmm RSX-11Mplus 4.2 aren't recognized as TSK images by "normal" 4.2
Well... the only indirect command processor present on RSXM70.DSK was
ICX.TSK
I transferred it from simh RX50 disk image to a RT-11 formatted floppy
with PUTR (copy /binary) and then with FLX
FLX> DU0:=DU1:ICX.TSK /RT
Then
> REM ...AT.
> INS $ICX.TSK
>@[1,2]STARTUP.CMD
and got a BIG system cras
Well..
The RSXM70.dsk has many TSKs not built.
How can I build them?
Thanks for your clear explanation.
I use simh regularly, VAX based emulation, to transfer and backup data
from my real VAXes. I also have a cluster of simh VAXes, so it won't be
difficult to get a PDP-11 up and running with simh.
I have putr and I've noticed it handles Files-11 read-only: I didn't
> The SYSVMR.CMD shows that the Indirect Command Processor is named ICP.TSK.
> Sadly, ICP.TSK is one of the four tasks that have read issues...
>
> I need another info: BAD is destructive or not destructive?
>
BAD is destructive to the data on the disk!
If there are only four tasks that have read
14 matches
Mail list logo
