Hi
Went to Starwars last night. Oh boy did they get it right this time!!
Look and feel of the original 1977 version. Really good new actors.
In a way it was like a retelling of history but in a completly new way.
The bombing runs up the trench used the same sighting system as thirty
odd ye
On 12/31/15 3:10 AM, Rod Smallwood wrote:
Hi
Went to Starwars last night.
Thanks a lot.
I should have known better than to open a message with that subject.
Some people are waiting for the nuts to quit filing theaters. Please
don't discuss w/o a warning as Al placed on the line (or if someone else
did, I've not gotten that message).
It is ill mannered at best.
Happy New Year,
don't mess up the movie for someone.
On 12/31/2015 1:09 PM, Al Kossow
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, jwsmobile wrote:
Some people are waiting for the nuts to quit filing theaters. Please don't
discuss w/o a warning as Al placed on the line (or if someone else did, I've
not gotten that message).
It is ill mannered at best.
OK
But, I probably won't see it for a few years,
It was thus said that the Great Fred Cisin once stated:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, jwsmobile wrote:
> >Some people are waiting for the nuts to quit filing theaters. Please don't
> >discuss w/o a warning as Al placed on the line (or if someone else did,
> >I've not gotten that message).
> >It is ill m
On Thu, 12/31/15, Fred Cisin wrote:
> One quick [non-spoiler?] question: Is it a remake? Or is it
> another in the "series"? (if so, earlier? later?)
It's in the series, specifically Episode 7, taking place sometime
after Revenge of the Jedi.
BLS
On 01/01/2016 02:54, jwsmobile wrote:
Some people are waiting for the nuts to quit filing theaters. Please
don't discuss w/o a warning as Al placed on the line (or if someone
else did, I've not gotten that message).
It is ill mannered at best.
Happy New Year,
don't mess up the movie for s
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015, Fred Cisin wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, jwsmobile wrote:
> >Some people are waiting for the nuts to quit filing theaters. Please don't
> >discuss w/o a warning as Al placed on the line (or if someone else did,
> >I've not gotten that message).
> >It is ill mannered at best.
>
