I was banned for ages, I've been told I'm not any more; test post;
disregard.
Mike
Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have seen no
traffic on it for a couple of days.
Kevin McQuiggin
Test failed
Please call service
Enviado do meu Tele-Movel
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, 20:30 Mike Ross via cctalk
wrote:
> I was banned for ages, I've been told I'm not any more; test post;
> disregard.
>
> Mike
>
601
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 00:33, Alexandre Souza via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Test failed
> Please call service
>
> Enviado do meu Tele-Movel
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, 20:30 Mike Ross via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> > I was banned for ages, I've been told I'm not any more; test post;
>
Sorry, we did not receive your message. Have you tried turning it off and
back on again?
:)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Sorry, we did not receive your message. Have you tried turning it off and
back on again?
:)
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
Are you still using an operating system that is MORE THAN 6 MONTHS o
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
> Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
Nice to see this list continues to circle the bowl.
On 9/13/2019 3:00 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
Nice to see this list continues to circle the bowl.
Bare metal machines don't need a OS. Just liner notes
on the drum in felt pen. Bad sector. Core dump f
I have to say I am receiving you 5 by 9 in Toronto :-)
(OK I will go away now and get my tin hat )
cheers,
NIgel
On 13/09/2019 19:01, ben via cctalk wrote:
On 9/13/2019 3:00 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
Uninstall and reinstall the
On 9/13/19 1:44 PM, Senile Old Man via cctalk wrote:
Uninstall and reinstall the OS.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
Nice to see this list continues to circle the bowl.
Sorry.
I didn't mean to offend or annoy. Just joining in on ridicule of "modern
tech support".
There a
I received your post, but mercifully I haven't received any of the
pointless replies to your post.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:30 AM Mike Ross via cctalk
wrote:
> I was banned for ages, I've been told I'm not any more; test post;
> disregard.
>
> Mike
>
0x06
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, 9:09 AM Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have
> seen no traffic on it for a couple of days.
>
> Kevin McQuiggin
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 5:09 PM Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have seen
> no traffic on it for a couple of days.
QSL
-tony
I see your test message!
On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 08:06 -0700, Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk wrote:
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the list but have seen
> no traffic on it for a couple of days.
>
> Kevin McQuiggin
I see it (and I observed the same thing - just rejoined after having
subscription problems stretching back to May, and didn't see any
traffic).
-ethan
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:09 PM Kevin McQuiggin via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Pardon the test message, I have just re-subscribed to the li
Hi,
I just saw that mails from some people now arrive as desired (real
sender, reply-to list), but some (e.g. myself) are still mangled with
"xxx via cctalk" - did I miss a setting?
Confused...
Philipp
On 04/03/2017 03:48 PM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk wrote:
Hi,
I just saw that mails from some people now arrive as desired (real
sender, reply-to list), but some (e.g. myself) are still mangled with
"xxx via cctalk" - did I miss a setting?
Confused...
Philipp
Wow, posting to cctech behav
17 matches
Mail list logo
