Re: emergency moderation mode RE: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

>Dave Mabry wrote: Jay West wrote on 2/6/2016 11:51 AM: I had already turned on emergency moderation mode to try and stem the tide of this escalating further. I had also already emailed a few people off-list about this, which is primarily how it should be handled. Those who should have been

Re: emergency moderation mode RE: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

+1 On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Dave Mabry wrote: > Jay West wrote on 2/6/2016 11:51 AM: > >> I had already turned on emergency moderation mode to try and stem the tide >> of this escalating further. I had also already emailed a few people >> off-list >> about this, which is primarily how it

Re: emergency moderation mode RE: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

Jay West wrote on 2/6/2016 11:51 AM: I had already turned on emergency moderation mode to try and stem the tide of this escalating further. I had also already emailed a few people off-list about this, which is primarily how it should be handled. Those who should have been corrected... were. Quiet

Re: emergency moderation mode RE: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

- Original Message - From: "Jay West" Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 11:51 AM ... > I submit that while this list may be small, it has the best content and > expertise, far better than others (I've looked). I submit that while the > SNRatio gets off track once in a great while, I've

emergency moderation mode RE: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

I had already turned on emergency moderation mode to try and stem the tide of this escalating further. I had also already emailed a few people off-list about this, which is primarily how it should be handled. Those who should have been corrected... were. Quietly. I'm rather tired of (a very few) p

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

- Original Message - From: "Dave Woyciesjes" To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" ; Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 10:35 PM Subject: Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2 > On 02/05/2016 05:40 PM, Steven Hirsch wrote: >

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

On 02/05/2016 05:40 PM, Steven Hirsch wrote: On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Liam Proven wrote: On 5 February 2016 at 18:07, Steven Hirsch wrote: On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Mazzini Alessandro wrote: Last night I had no issues to navigate it. Didn't t

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

On 02/05/2016 12:32 PM, Liam Proven wrote: On 5 February 2016 at 18:07, Steven Hirsch wrote: On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Mazzini Alessandro wrote: Last night I had no issues to navigate it. Didn't try today the URL works fine here. Mus

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Liam Proven wrote: On 5 February 2016 at 18:07, Steven Hirsch wrote: On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Mazzini Alessandro wrote: Last night I had no issues to navigate it. Didn't try today the URL works fine here. Must h

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

>> https://sites.google.com/site/rhdisk0/unix/aix/aixps2 >> > > Is anyone else having issues with that URL? I get a quick flash of a > legitimate web page before the browser fills up with ASCII garbage. No, it loaded fine on my browser.

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

On 05/02/2016 17:32, Liam Proven wrote: On 5 February 2016 at 18:07, Steven Hirsch wrote: On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: the URL works fine here. Must have been authored against IE and happens to hit a Firefox bug. It renders properly in Win7 IE. I'm seeing an increasing

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

> On 05 Feb 2016, at 18:34 , Guy Sotomayor wrote: > > >> On Feb 5, 2016, at 4:56 AM, Steven Hirsch wrote: >> >> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Kevin Bowling wrote: >> >>> This comes up often and usually with a lot of people that have no idea what >>> they are talking about chiming in that you are stupi

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 4:56 AM, Steven Hirsch wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Kevin Bowling wrote: > >> This comes up often and usually with a lot of people that have no idea what >> they are talking about chiming in that you are stupid for asking. They are >> wrong, HW emulation is not that diff

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

On 5 February 2016 at 18:07, Steven Hirsch wrote: > On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Mazzini Alessandro >> wrote: >>> >>> Last night I had no issues to navigate it. Didn't try today >> >> >> the URL works fine here. > > > Must have been authored ag

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

ng AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2 On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Kevin Bowling wrote: This comes up often and usually with a lot of people that have no idea what they are talking about chiming in that you are stupid for asking. They are wrong, HW emulation is not that difficult: https://sites.googl

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

febbraio 2016 13:56 > A: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > Oggetto: Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2 > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Kevin Bowling wrote: > >> This comes up often and usually with a lot of people that have no idea >> what th

R: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

- WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2 On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Kevin Bowling wrote: > This comes up often and usually with a lot of people that have no idea > what they are talking about chiming in that you are stupid for asking. > They are wrong, HW emulation is not that difficult: > https:/

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Kevin Bowling wrote: This comes up often and usually with a lot of people that have no idea what they are talking about chiming in that you are stupid for asking. They are wrong, HW emulation is not that difficult: https://sites.google.com/site/rhdisk0/unix/aix/aixps2 I

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

This comes up often and usually with a lot of people that have no idea what they are talking about chiming in that you are stupid for asking. They are wrong, HW emulation is not that difficult: https://sites.google.com/site/rhdisk0/unix/aix/aixps2 Regards, Kevin On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:15 AM, J

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

> On Feb 4, 2016, at 12:18 AM, Jonathan Katz wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote: >> All this AIX 1.x on Intel talk has me wanting to look at it deeper. >> >> Does anyone have AIX 1.3 running on VirtualBox ? >> >> Thanks, > > This was talked about a while back. The PS

Re: Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote: > All this AIX 1.x on Intel talk has me wanting to look at it deeper. > > Does anyone have AIX 1.3 running on VirtualBox ? > > Thanks, This was talked about a while back. The PS/2 (x86) version of AIX required some specific hardware with an MCA bu

Virtualizing AIX 1.3 - WAS::::Re: AIX for IBM PS/2

All this AIX 1.x on Intel talk has me wanting to look at it deeper. Does anyone have AIX 1.3 running on VirtualBox ? Thanks, Jerry On 02/ 3/16 11:24 AM, supervinx wrote: This is a dual booting PS/2 (OS/2 and AiX), configured using kev009 floppy images and instructions... http://www.superv