Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

Handy link. I have need of exactly that interface myself and didn't want to design my own.

RE: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

I think it depends on if you are already aware of the existence and purpose of the hackaday web site. Having had one of my projects published there I am aware of the site and wouldn't hesitate to click that link. On the other hand, if I wasn't aware of the hackaday site I might think differently,

RE: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

Keep it friendly. The last few posts on this do not comply. Last warning -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jason Scott Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 10:39 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts

RE: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

Top posting because It takes two (at least) to start it, and you certainly played your part. While it is not "forbidden" to just post a URL without any explanation, it would be a good idea to include something with it so that we know if we want to click on it or not. Otherwise, it's going to

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

Special shout-out to the two well-meaning buttercups who emailed me off list to mansplain me about how to conduct myself in an arena that appears to have the emotional stability of a brain-damaged toddler. On May 30, 2016 11:28, "Jason Scott" wrote: > If rockets ran on

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

> You either have a stick up your ass, are too stupid to know the > difference between a malware link and a real link OR > both. There are a lot of ways that malware links can slip through. My eyes are getting old and failing, so that some m's and look like n's. or There is a smudge on my

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

If rockets ran on butthurt, we be colonizing Mars. And I'd have some awesome candidates for the first round. On May 30, 2016 09:32, "Evan Koblentz" wrote: > >>>

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

brilliant :) thanks On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:54 PM, wulfman wrote: > I did not start the fire. > > > On 5/29/2016 6:43 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > > On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote: > >> You either have a stick up your ass, are too stupid to know the > >> difference between

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

I did not start the fire. On 5/29/2016 6:43 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote: >> You either have a stick up your ass, are too stupid to know the >> difference between a malware link and a real link OR >> both. >> Now go back to your worrying about the 0.1% of links

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote: You either have a stick up your ass, are too stupid to know the difference between a malware link and a real link OR both. Now go back to your worrying about the 0.1% of links that contain malware. I'm glad to hear it. OK, initially, I was glad that

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

You either have a stick up your ass, are too stupid to know the difference between a malware link and a real link OR both. Now go back to your worrying about the 0.1% of links that contain malware. On 5/29/2016 5:48 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+view Did you have anything to say about it? Or are you just dumping a URL on us? On Sun, 29 May 2016, Evan

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote: I figured some of you might have had an interest. Excuse me if i was wrong. WITH a sentence or so of commentary. An email with NO content other than a URL and an impersonal signature, but no personal description, and with a subject line of the URL looks

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+view Did you have anything to say about it? Or are you just dumping a URL on us? Oh come on. He didn't do

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

I figured some of you might have had an interest. Excuse me if i was wrong. On 5/29/2016 5:02 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote: >>

Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+vie

On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm_source=feedburner_medium=feed_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29_content=FeedBurner+user+view -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for