Re: simh, professional 350, 380

2019-09-25 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On Sep 25, 2019, at 2:35 AM, emanuel stiebler via cctalk > wrote: > > On 2019-09-24 23:22, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 6:29 AM emanuel stiebler via cctalk < >> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: >> >>> I saw an old version from 2006 as "xhomer" which emulates the

Re: simh, professional 350, 380

2019-09-25 Thread emanuel stiebler via cctalk
On 2019-09-24 23:22, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 6:29 AM emanuel stiebler via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > >> I saw an old version from 2006 as "xhomer" which emulates the >> professional 350. Was there anywhere a version, which emulates the 380 > > > I

Re: simh, professional 350, 380

2019-09-24 Thread Eric Smith via cctalk
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 6:29 AM emanuel stiebler via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > I saw an old version from 2006 as "xhomer" which emulates the > professional 350. Was there anywhere a version, which emulates the 380 I used to work at the same company as the author. He didn't own a

Re: simh, professional 350, 380

2019-09-22 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
I haven't seen one. And unfortunately xhomer isn't maintained, and its license is incompatible with the current SIMH so it can't be merged. The author has said he'd consider changing that but I haven't heard back about that (it's been a long time). At this point it may be the best answer is

simh, professional 350, 380

2019-09-22 Thread emanuel stiebler via cctalk
Hi all, I saw an old version from 2006 as "xhomer" which emulates the professional 350. Was there anywhere a version, which emulates the 380? Cheers