Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] dtksh: bump to 1.0.10

2025-11-30 Thread Jon Trulson
Hi, this would be cool... But it does not apply...  Tons of errors, might need to rebase. Also it seems to want to attempt to patch things that do not exist - remember that ksh93 is a subtree installed at programs/dtksh/ksh93.  Your patch did not seem to be trying to install anything there.

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] test for poll.h

2025-11-30 Thread Jon Trulson
Hi, I agree with Peter.  Also - this patch does not apply. Perhaps it needs to be rebased on current master? -jon On 11/30/25 07:45, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: Fixed ordering per Peter's suggestion. Thank you for your time, -Chase On Sunday, November 30th, 2025 at 4:08 AM, Peter Trib

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Proposal: Stop building and distributing htag1 and ctag1

2025-11-30 Thread Jon Trulson
On 11/29/25 10:34, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: From my study of the code, htag2 under dthelp/parser/pass2 is simply a newer version of htag1 and ctag1 as they share 90% of the same code with pass2 having newer SCCS file dates. Also unlike some of the other parsers we have had like sgml t

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] DTWM and DTsession: break ShowWaitState into two functions.

2025-11-30 Thread Jon Trulson
Applied, thanks! -jon On 11/27/25 21:15, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: Was fixing a bug I accidentally introduced a long time ago when I stumbled upon this function. Boolean function arguments are bad code practice, breaking the function in half makes the code more readable. Thank you

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] dtmail: remove DEAD_WOOD code

2025-11-30 Thread Jon Trulson
Applied, thanks! -jon On 11/27/25 20:31, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote: Eventually I would also like to replace the md5 code in here, but as I've learned there are a dozen libraries plus the system builtin libraries that provide some sort of an md5 function suite... Thank you for your ti

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] test for poll.h

2025-11-30 Thread Chase via cdesktopenv-devel
Fixed ordering per Peter's suggestion. Thank you for your time, -Chase On Sunday, November 30th, 2025 at 4:08 AM, Peter Tribble wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 7:58 PM Chase via cdesktopenv-devel > wrote: > >> Not much else to say for this one. > > Looking at this, the order of HAVE_POLL_H

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] test for poll.h

2025-11-30 Thread Peter Tribble
On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 7:58 PM Chase via cdesktopenv-devel < [email protected]> wrote: > Not much else to say for this one. > Looking at this, the order of HAVE_POLL_H and HAVE_SYS_POLL_H is inconsistent, so that if we have both (it does depend on the autoconf version as to