I think you could also use
git clone --recurse-submodules
to clone in the source and the submodule in the same pass.
Thank you for your time,
-Chase
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, January 24, 2021 1:37 PM, Jon Trulson wrote:
> On 1/23/21 8:36 PM, Chase wrote:
>
>> Jon,
>> Hmm, If
On 1/23/21 8:36 PM, Chase wrote:
> Jon,
> Hmm, If I am understanding you correctly (which I don't think I am),
> git wouldn't properly clone the submodule into the ksh93 directory?
> Maybe if thats the case, it could be fixed with adding in an empty
> ksh93 directory for it to clone into to the rep
Jon,
Hmm, If I am understanding you correctly (which I don't think I am), git
wouldn't properly clone the submodule into the ksh93 directory? Maybe if thats
the case, it could be fixed with adding in an empty ksh93 directory for it to
clone into to the repo. It is worth noting however that git s
On 1/22/21 4:41 PM, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel wrote:
> Since Lev fixed the errors in upstream for musl and upstreamed them,
> lets pull that in so any potential merge to master also can safely
> build on musl (thus the old changes from Lev we would throw away for
> old ksh would be replaced with
The new ksh93 maintainer seems amenable to getting it working on every Unix
system, so that allays my earlier concerns. I still think it would be nice to
get some feedback from someone running NetBSD on whether the new shell is worse
or broken compared to the existing one. Perhaps we could maint
Since Lev fixed the errors in upstream for musl and upstreamed them, lets pull
that in so any potential merge to master also can safely build on musl (thus
the old changes from Lev we would throw away for old ksh would be replaced with
the new changes)l. I also threw in compiler warning fixes fo
