On 1/11/21 2:04 PM, Danilo Pecher wrote:
> I could try the BSD builds on the weekend. Currently a bit too busy at
> work to do it on week days.,
That would be awesome. And... I understand that problem :)
-jon
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 02:24, Jon Trulson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your contr
On 1/11/21 2:21 PM, Lev wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Thanks for catching that, it’s building fine on musl with just . I’ve
> attached the rebased patches.
Thanks! Applied to master.
-jon
> Kind regards,
> Lev
>
>
>
>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 18:23, Jon Trulson wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your contr
On 1/11/21 3:13 PM, Danilo Pecher wrote:
> As far as I remember Lesstif has always been unsuitable to build CDE.
> I think one of the OS specific build pages even explicitely mentions
> not to use Lesstif, but open-motif instead. Since the day Motif has
> been opensourced there is no real point in
As far as I remember Lesstif has always been unsuitable to build CDE.
I think one of the OS specific build pages even explicitely mentions
not to use Lesstif, but open-motif instead. Since the day Motif has
been opensourced there is no real point in using lesstif imho.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:56
Hi Jon,
Thanks for catching that, it’s building fine on musl with just . I’ve
attached the rebased patches.
Kind regards,
Lev
0003-Define-time_t-within-AccessI.h-by-including-time.h.patch
Description: Binary data
0004-Hide-FILE-internals-from-the-musl-C-library-that-con.patch
Description: B
I could try the BSD builds on the weekend. Currently a bit too busy at
work to do it on week days.,
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 02:24, Jon Trulson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your contribution. At a first glance it looks ok, except for
> patch 0003:
>
> Author: Lev Kujawski
>
> Date: Wed Jan 6
Hi,
Thanks for your contribution. At a first glance it looks ok, except for
patch 0003:
Author: Lev Kujawski
Date: Wed Jan 6 12:13:40 2021 -0700
Define time_t within AccessI.h by including .
diff --git a/cde/lib/DtHelp/AccessI.h b/cde/lib/DtHelp/AccessI.h
index 4dcc6270..206135e5 1006
Hello,
The attached patches are the first of a set fixing various incompatibilities
between CDE and the musl C library. Musl has become a popular alternative to
glibc and uClibc, with distributions like Void already supporting it for
desktop use.
Advantages of musl include the ease of creating
