>From: Douglas Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 16:56:45 2000
>> [snip]
>>
>> It seems that you did not understand how interfaces in a POSIX enviroment
>> are implemented:
>>
>> - Call syscall of ioctl() function with paramet
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> As you see the March 99 version if sg.c implemented SG_SET_RESERVED_SIZE as NO-OP.
>I don't know which sg version this file corresponds to. I only have the
I told you: the march 99 version!
>> For this reason, I mailed to the maintainer but he was either unwilling o
On 3 Jul, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> I am still not sure if would be better not to allow to raise the DMA
>>> limit in pre-2.4 kernels.
>
>>My understanding of the scsi-generic.txt is that a reserved buffer is
>>indeed available, in which case it would be useful t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 16:56:45 2000
> [snip]
>
> It seems that you did not understand how interfaces in a POSIX enviroment
> are implemented:
>
> - Call syscall of ioctl() function with parameters
>
> - Check return value
>
> - If re
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 16:56:45 2000
>> >From reading the source:
>>
>> case SG_SET_RESERVED_SIZE:
>> /* currently ignored, future extension */
>> if (O_RDWR != (filp->f_flags & O_ACCMODE))
>> return -EACCES;
>> result = verify_area(VERIFY_READ
Hi,
you really do not want to create a bootable Win98 CD. You want to burn it
right?
later
Juergen Hoffmann
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 07:32:49PM +0530, Ridhwan wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm having problems creating a bootable cd rom just like the
> original I'm having. This Win98
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> I am still not sure if would be better not to allow to raise the DMA
> >> limit in pre-2.4 kernels.
>
> >My understanding of the scsi-generic.txt is that a reserved buffer is
> >indeed available, in which case it would be useful to us
one option:
boot off of the original win 98 cdrom.
copy all of the files from the a: (actually the boot image assigned to a)
to a hard disk say c:\tmp\astuff
then make a win 98 boot disk and copy the directory structure from
c:\tmp\astuff to a:\.
then use dd on the new floppy disk to make the
Hello,
I'm having problems creating a bootable cd rom just like the
original I'm having. This Win98 Installable CD is bootable and when booted
from, comes to the A: prompt where its bootable files are present. The same CD
has another partition as D: , which has all the ins
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I am still not sure if would be better not to allow to raise the DMA
>> limit in pre-2.4 kernels.
>My understanding of the scsi-generic.txt is that a reserved buffer is
>indeed available, in which case it would be useful to use
>SG_SET_RESERVED_SIZE:
>| The size of t
Hello
Out of curiosity, what is the time schedule for adding udf support?
Would it be available for all linux kernels? The developers of kernel 2.4 seem
to be adding udf read and write support. Cdrecord udf support has nothing to
do with it, isn't it?
Thanks
Regards
Eduardo
>From: Geoffrey Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You did not call cdrecord with the -v option. This makes it impossible
to give you help on you problem.
>Perhaps someone can suggest why this command
>% cdwrite /dir
>where cdwrite is
>cdwrite ()
>{
>IMG_SIZE=`mkisofs -R -q -print-size $1 2>&1 |
Hello,
Perhaps someone can suggest why this command
% cdwrite /dir
where cdwrite is
cdwrite ()
{
IMG_SIZE=`mkisofs -R -q -print-size $1 2>&1 | sed -e "s/.* = //"`;
echo Backing up $IMG_SIZE bytets;
[ "0$IMG_SIZE" -ne 0 ] && mkisofs -r $1 | cdrecord speed=10 dev=0,2,0
tsize=${IMG_
NEW features of cdrecord-1.9a05:
We are now only a few releases away from the final libscg that includes
SCSI low level command transport.
All:
- scsi_raisedma() disabled on pre-2.2.10 kernels
TODO:
- Better BeOS integration
Cdrecord:
- Fix for a problem with 99 minute CD'
14 matches
Mail list logo
