This command below destroyed another windows copy
WHY
/>./cdrecord dev=1,1,0 -v -speed=4 cdimage.raw
Cdrecord 1.11a03 (i386-pc-solaris2.8) Copyright (C)
1995-2001 Jِrg
Schillin=
g
TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM
scsidev: '1,1,0'
scsibus: 1 target: 1 lun: 0
Warning: Using USCSI interface.
Using libs
I need binary version of cdrtool for Solaris 8 intel
platform . Where can I find it ?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Problem:
The old (1.11a12) version successfully creates CD-RWs that are
readable, bootable, etc. by all OS's here, the new version (2.0x) does
not.
System (msinfo):
OS Name Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional
Version 5.0.2195 Service Pack 3 Build 2195
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System N
> Public does not seem to share your viewpoint and does not experience
> cdrecord and cdrecord-ProDVD as the same program. Neither do I...
Same here. :-)
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, t
> Therefore the question to the public!
>
> Guys! Should I add a new question, "How dvd+rw-tools are different from
> cdrecord-ProDVD" to question/answers section on page,
> http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/, or is the page sufficiently
> complete as it is? And once you answer, ...
> >> As it looks that you updated the web page, is there any reason that you
> >> sill state that cdrecord does not support DVD+?
>
> >You most likely refer to the second question, "Kernel patch? This sounds
>
> No, as I clearly said, I am refering to the fact that cdrecord-ProDVD
> also supports
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 10 19:31:17 2003
>> As it looks that you updated the web page, is there any reason that you
>> sill state that cdrecord does not support DVD+?
>You most likely refer to the second question, "Kernel patch? This sounds
No, as I clearly said, I am refering to the fa
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >Linux sg driver version: 3.1.24
> >/usr/bin/cdrecord: Warning: using inofficial libscg transport code version =
> >([EMAIL PROTECTED] '@(#)scsi-linux-sg.c=091.75=
> > 02/10/21 Copyright 1997 J. Schilling').
> >Cdrecord 2.0 (i686-suse-linux) Copyright
8 matches
Mail list logo