On Mon 3 November 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the
> > comment Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over
> > 2GB in size, as long as each file inside that image is no
> > larger than 2GB.
>
> Careful - the comment was about
> Linux in general does have large file support now doesn't it?
Yes, for a little while. This is filesystem-dependent though!! Looks
like iso9660 has missed out so far.
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/
>From: Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Do I need a later version of dvdrecord to use DVD-R 4x media in a LaCie
>Multi Drive DVD-R/RAM recorder? It isn't a drive that needs a firmware
>upgrade to prevent damage such as a Pioneer drive. Dvdrecord output the
>error message I am including below when I
>From: Udo Buedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Rob Bogus wrote:
>[incorrect audio cd]
>> It's not clear why using a newer version might trigger a problem,
> > but the firmware might have a bug in one mode or another.
>The firmware in some LiteOn writer produce incorrect subchannel data for
>audio cd
Joerg Schilling wrote:
This is an illegal program that violates GPL!
It is definitely not a true cdrecord. If you have any problem with this
illegal program, call the distributor...
My mistake actually. I had basically forwarded a message to the cdwrite
list from someone else. Didn't actually
>From: Gary Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have been using dvd+rw-tools (5.13.4.7.4) and mkisofs (cdrtools 1.11a29)
>to write backups to DVD. This generally works. However I encountered
>a problem when one of the files was 2351679431 bytes in size: the disk
>was written with no errors reported,
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > * The ISO-9660 filesystem only stores 32 bits for file size.
>>
>> But the ISO-9660 _standard_ stores 32 bits for the size of each
>> _extent_ and there can be a virtually unlimited number of
>> _extents_ in a single file at ISO-9660 Interchange Lev
>From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the comment
>> Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over 2GB in size,
>> as long as each file inside that image is no larger than 2GB.
>Careful - the comment was about mkisofs, althoug
Somebody is posting from an illegal mail address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please immediately fix this. It is extremely unfriendly to use illegal mail adresses
as this is the typical way spammers do their "work".
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PR
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is an illegal program that violates GPL!
how/why would it violate GPL?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1:50 PM +0100 11/3/03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>> But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the comment
>>> Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over 2GB in size,
>>> as long as each file inside that image is no larger than 2G
Hi!
If I understand correctly, the use of ide-scsi under 2.6
is deprecated. However, I am unable to write to /dev/hdx
directly under 2.6.0-test8.
This works with the patched ide-scsi and sr_mod.
I have looked into ide-cd.c and I think it only
supports writing for dvd-ram.
Am I missing something?
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Csaba Halasz wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the use of ide-scsi under 2.6
> is deprecated.
More or less, yes.
> However, I am unable to write to /dev/hdx directly under 2.6.0-test8.
With what kind of errors?
> This works with the patched ide-scsi and sr_mod.
Patched? W
>> However, I am unable to write to /dev/hdx directly under 2.6.0-test8.
> With what kind of errors?
It is read-only. -EROFS, if I remember correctly.
>> This works with the patched ide-scsi and sr_mod.
> Patched? With what patches?
With Andy's dvd+rw patches:
http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Csaba Halasz wrote:
> Are we talking about the same thing? I need a writeable
> _block device_. I have _no problems_ using cdrecord or
> growisofs (w/ poor man's access method).
Ah.. sorry. No I meant with cdrecord.
regards
Markus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> so apparently at least someone looked at ISO Level 3 support. I'd
>> say send a message to linux-kernel and see what they say about
>> it...
>
>Yes, together with a raft of other iso9660 issues :(
>
>Perhaps mkisofs is now able to handle files >2GB,
hi there,
anyone seeing this on:
Linux version 2.6.0-test9
GSA-4040B (attached via USB2.0)
any comments, suggestions etc.
/uwe
scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0009
printing eip:
f88dc907
*pde =
Oop
> Somebody is posting from an illegal mail address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Please immediately fix this. It is extremely unfriendly to use illegal mail adresses
> as this is the typical way spammers do their "work".
That would have been me, and it is a very effective spam protection and
therefore
On Mon 3 November 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the
> > comment Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over
> > 2GB in size, as long as each file inside that image is no
> > larger than 2GB.
>
> Careful - the comment was about
> Linux in general does have large file support now doesn't it?
Yes, for a little while. This is filesystem-dependent though!! Looks
like iso9660 has missed out so far.
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/
>From: Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Do I need a later version of dvdrecord to use DVD-R 4x media in a LaCie
>Multi Drive DVD-R/RAM recorder? It isn't a drive that needs a firmware
>upgrade to prevent damage such as a Pioneer drive. Dvdrecord output the
>error message I am including below when I
>From: Udo Buedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Rob Bogus wrote:
>[incorrect audio cd]
>> It's not clear why using a newer version might trigger a problem,
> > but the firmware might have a bug in one mode or another.
>The firmware in some LiteOn writer produce incorrect subchannel data for
>audio cd
Joerg Schilling wrote:
This is an illegal program that violates GPL!
It is definitely not a true cdrecord. If you have any problem with this
illegal program, call the distributor...
My mistake actually. I had basically forwarded a message to the cdwrite
list from someone else. Didn't actually no
>From: Gary Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have been using dvd+rw-tools (5.13.4.7.4) and mkisofs (cdrtools 1.11a29)
>to write backups to DVD. This generally works. However I encountered
>a problem when one of the files was 2351679431 bytes in size: the disk
>was written with no errors reported,
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > * The ISO-9660 filesystem only stores 32 bits for file size.
>>
>> But the ISO-9660 _standard_ stores 32 bits for the size of each
>> _extent_ and there can be a virtually unlimited number of
>> _extents_ in a single file at ISO-9660 Interchange Lev
>From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the comment
>> Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over 2GB in size,
>> as long as each file inside that image is no larger than 2GB.
>Careful - the comment was about mkisofs, althoug
Somebody is posting from an illegal mail address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please immediately fix this. It is extremely unfriendly to use illegal mail
adresses
as this is the typical way spammers do their "work".
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL P
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is an illegal program that violates GPL!
how/why would it violate GPL?
At 1:50 PM +0100 11/3/03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>> But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the comment
>>> Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over 2GB in size,
>>> as long as each file inside that image is no larger than 2G
Hi!
If I understand correctly, the use of ide-scsi under 2.6
is deprecated. However, I am unable to write to /dev/hdx
directly under 2.6.0-test8.
This works with the patched ide-scsi and sr_mod.
I have looked into ide-cd.c and I think it only
supports writing for dvd-ram.
Am I missing something?
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Csaba Halasz wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the use of ide-scsi under 2.6
> is deprecated.
More or less, yes.
> However, I am unable to write to /dev/hdx directly under 2.6.0-test8.
With what kind of errors?
> This works with the patched ide-scsi and sr_mod.
Patched? W
>> However, I am unable to write to /dev/hdx directly under 2.6.0-test8.
> With what kind of errors?
It is read-only. -EROFS, if I remember correctly.
>> This works with the patched ide-scsi and sr_mod.
> Patched? With what patches?
With Andy's dvd+rw patches:
http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Csaba Halasz wrote:
> Are we talking about the same thing? I need a writeable
> _block device_. I have _no problems_ using cdrecord or
> growisofs (w/ poor man's access method).
Ah.. sorry. No I meant with cdrecord.
regards
Markus
Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> so apparently at least someone looked at ISO Level 3 support. I'd
>> say send a message to linux-kernel and see what they say about
>> it...
>
>Yes, together with a raft of other iso9660 issues :(
>
>Perhaps mkisofs is now able to handle files >2GB,
hi there,
anyone seeing this on:
Linux version 2.6.0-test9
GSA-4040B (attached via USB2.0)
any comments, suggestions etc.
/uwe
scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0009
printing eip:
f88dc907
*pde =
Oop
> Somebody is posting from an illegal mail address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Please immediately fix this. It is extremely unfriendly to use illegal mail
> adresses
> as this is the typical way spammers do their "work".
That would have been me, and it is a very effective spam protection and
theref
36 matches
Mail list logo
