On Monday 29 December 2003 01:37 pm, James Finnall wrote:
> Take a look at Smart Boot Manager and see if it will perform as you desire.
> I know it has worked most excellent for me, on both the newer machines and
> the older that do not even support bootable CD's.
>
> http://btmgr.sourceforge.net/
On Monday 29 December 2003 01:37 pm, James Finnall wrote:
> Take a look at Smart Boot Manager and see if it will perform as you desire.
> I know it has worked most excellent for me, on both the newer machines and
> the older that do not even support bootable CD's.
>
> http://btmgr.sourceforge.net/
> >Can you be more specific about the bugs please? Or does that "contain
> >bugs" simply refer to that they're not the latest alpha version?
>
> Patches that don't follow the conceptional design of complex data structures
> easily break functions that the author of the patch is not aware of.
In t
>From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> All recent SuSE distributions contain inofficial and modified versions
>> of cdrecord that are known to contain bugs and open new security holes.
>Can you be more specific about the bugs please? Or does that "contain
>bugs" simply refer to t
> >Can you be more specific about the bugs please? Or does that "contain
> >bugs" simply refer to that they're not the latest alpha version?
>
> Patches that don't follow the conceptional design of complex data structures
> easily break functions that the author of the patch is not aware of.
In t
> All recent SuSE distributions contain inofficial and modified versions
> of cdrecord that are known to contain bugs and open new security holes.
Can you be more specific about the bugs please? Or does that "contain
bugs" simply refer to that they're not the latest alpha version?
Wha
>From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> All recent SuSE distributions contain inofficial and modified versions
>> of cdrecord that are known to contain bugs and open new security holes.
>Can you be more specific about the bugs please? Or does that "contain
>bugs" simply refer to t
On Monday 29 December 2003 15:15, Rob Bogus wrote:
> I have been creating bootable (el torrito style) CDs since the
> capability was added to mkisofs ages ago. However, from time to time I
> find a system which doesn't know how to boot CD and must boot from
> floppy. With programs like Linux boot d
> All recent SuSE distributions contain inofficial and modified versions
> of cdrecord that are known to contain bugs and open new security holes.
Can you be more specific about the bugs please? Or does that "contain
bugs" simply refer to that they're not the latest alpha version?
Wha
On Monday 29 December 2003 15:15, Rob Bogus wrote:
> I have been creating bootable (el torrito style) CDs since the
> capability was added to mkisofs ages ago. However, from time to time I
> find a system which doesn't know how to boot CD and must boot from
> floppy. With programs like Linux boot d
I have been creating bootable (el torrito style) CDs since the
capability was added to mkisofs ages ago. However, from time to time I
find a system which doesn't know how to boot CD and must boot from
floppy. With programs like Linux boot disks that's not a problem, one is
included. My question
I have been creating bootable (el torrito style) CDs since the
capability was added to mkisofs ages ago. However, from time to time I
find a system which doesn't know how to boot CD and must boot from
floppy. With programs like Linux boot disks that's not a problem, one is
included. My question
I was reading mkisofs ChangeLog at 2.01a03 and found this:
- The final padding that is added by default is now 150 sectors
which is the required size of the track post gap on a CD.
Could anyone point me what is this?
It seems that is on the standard.
What was the previous behavior?
I was reading mkisofs ChangeLog at 2.01a03 and found this:
- The final padding that is added by default is now 150 sectors
which is the required size of the track post gap on a CD.
Could anyone point me what is this?
It seems that is on the standard.
What was the previous behavior?
What's the difference between cdrecord dev=/dev/hdX and cdrecord
dev=ATAPI:0,X,0?
What's the difference between cdrecord dev=/dev/hdX and cdrecord
dev=ATAPI:0,X,0?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NEW features of cdrtools-2.01a22:
Please have a look at the German open Source Center BerliOS at www.berlios.de
BerliOS will continue to support free hosting of cryptography projects even
when US laws change and don't allow to host cryptography projects in the USA.
Also look at sourcewell.berlios.
NEW features of cdrtools-2.01a22:
Please have a look at the German open Source Center BerliOS at www.berlios.de
BerliOS will continue to support free hosting of cryptography projects even
when US laws change and don't allow to host cryptography projects in the USA.
Also look at sourcewell.berlios.
Subscribe
Subscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
