Volker Kuhlmann>
> Let's not forget that there are 2 separate changes SuSE makes: the DVD
> addons (daft, and I've told them so),
About that i don't care much.
growisofs covers all my DVD needs.
I understand, though, that these DVD "addons" are an
unfriendly gesture towards the only person who
pr
Frederick Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: cd0: transfer error, downgrading to
> >>> DMA mode 2
>
> >Your problem is caused by a OpenBSD kernel bug. The kernel does not
> >handle odd DMA counts for ATA correctly.
>
> Are you
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:18:52AM +0200, Frederick Page wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Joerg Schilling wrote on Fri, Aug 20 2004:
>
> >>> Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: cd0: transfer error, downgrading to
> >>> DMA mode 2
>
> >Your problem is caused by a OpenBSD ker
Hi Joerg,
Joerg Schilling wrote on Fri, Aug 20 2004:
>>> Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: cd0: transfer error, downgrading to
>>> DMA mode 2
>Your problem is caused by a OpenBSD kernel bug. The kernel does not
>handle odd DMA counts for ATA correctly.
Are you
Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your problem is caused by a OpenBSD kernel bug. The kernel does not handle
> > odd DMA counts for ATA correctly.
>
> really? you have made a PR about this? I don't get anything matching
> 'schilling' or 'schilly' or 'schily'.
>
> but I do see http://ww
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:47:29AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Your problem is caused by a OpenBSD kernel bug. The kernel does not handle
> > > odd DMA counts for ATA correctly.
> >
> > really? you have made a PR about this? I don't get anythin
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:11:31AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >Frederick Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Aug 19 18:34:35 thebetteros /bsd: pciide0:1: bogus intr
> >> Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: cd0(pciide0:1:0): timeout
> >> Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: type: atapi
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:12:56AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > as it turned out far too late that cdda2wav did not
> > > work when installed suid root on Fr
Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aug 19 18:34:35 thebetteros /bsd: pciide0:1: bogus intr
> > Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: cd0(pciide0:1:0): timeout
> > Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: type: atapi
> > Aug 19 18:39:45 thebetteros /bsd: c_bcount: 1181
> > Aug 19 18:39:45
Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > as it turned out far too late that cdda2wav did not
> > work when installed suid root on FreeBSD, I did include a dirty hack
> > into cdda2wav/setuid.c in order to honor
>Frederick Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >In order to make sure that cdda2wav is not hitting the same problems
>> >on OpenBSD & NetBSD, I would need people who like to test a suid
>> >cdda2wav on OpenBSD & NetBSD systems.
>>
>> /tmp$ su
>> Password:
>> /tmp$ whoami
>> root
>> /tmp$ uname -a
>
> Volker >
> > I would have provided cdrecord packages, alas I never had problems with
> the SuSE-supplied ones, therefore no point spending time on it.
>
> The binary (with DVD patch, disclaimer and all) which i
> found after system installation did not work setuid root.
> Since that method is ad
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 06:44:08PM +0200, Frederick Page wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Joerg Schilling wrote on Thu, Aug 19 2004:
>
> >In order to make sure that cdda2wav is not hitting the same problems
> >on OpenBSD & NetBSD, I would need people who like to test a suid
> >cdda2wav on OpenBSD & NetBSD
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as it turned out far too late that cdda2wav did not
> work when installed suid root on FreeBSD, I did include a dirty hack
> into cdda2wav/setuid.c in order to honor the fact that FreeBSD now
> did try to implement POSI
Hi Joerg,
Joerg Schilling wrote on Thu, Aug 19 2004:
>In order to make sure that cdda2wav is not hitting the same problems
>on OpenBSD & NetBSD, I would need people who like to test a suid
>cdda2wav on OpenBSD & NetBSD systems.
/tmp$ su
Password:
/tmp$ whoami
root
/tmp$ uname -a
OpenBSD thebette
>>> come up with suggestions how to force SuSE to follow the GPL again.
>>> Jörg
>>How about providing operational binaries for
>>SuSE users at the cdrtools download site ?
>
> ... just check:
>
>ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
>
I meant vanilla cdrecord for CD.
As produced b
On Thu 19 August 2004 14:35, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Obviously you're on the back foot and ran out of arguments,
> > otherwise you wouldn't spend a whole email on discussing a
> > minor point (so I didn't check my PPS carefully enough) and
> > nothing
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> come up with suggestions how to force SuSE to follow the GPL again.
>> Jörg
>How about providing operational binaries for
>SuSE users at the cdrtools download site ?
If you would look a bit to the left and to the right before posting,
you would know that this is true
>From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Obviously you're on the back foot and ran out of arguments, otherwise
>you wouldn't spend a whole email on discussing a minor point (so I
>didn't check my PPS carefully enough) and nothing else, instead of
>sticking to the 2 points in question. And so th
> How about providing operational binaries for
> SuSE users at the cdrtools download site ?
I would have provided cdrecord packages, alas I never had problems with
the SuSE-supplied ones, therefore no point spending time on it.
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 wit
Hi all,
as it turned out far too late that cdda2wav did not
work when installed suid root on FreeBSD, I did include a dirty hack
into cdda2wav/setuid.c in order to honor the fact that FreeBSD now
did try to implement POSIX uid handling on top of the old
BSD ID swapping method.
In order to make su
> then why all the griping about GPL violations?
If this question is in my direction: because I got fed up with constant
and annoying gripes about GPL violations by someone who can't even
point to a reasonable actual violation[1] and then can't comply
himself[2].
Besides, I'd like to know the lic
> come up with suggestions how to force SuSE to follow the GPL again.
> Jörg
How about providing operational binaries for
SuSE users at the cdrtools download site ?
That would help the little SuSE users because
they do not have to cope with the compile time
problems.
That would consolidate the c
> However, none of this is the issue. What Jörg is getting worked up
> about is that he gets email from people complaining about bugs in a
> version of his software that he has nothing to do with (neither
> that version of cdrecord nor the bugs). That's the real issue.
I can totally sympathise
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 08:47:50AM +0200, Lourens Veen wrote:
> On Thu 19 August 2004 07:51, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >
> > I doubt any government regards the GPL as an entity, so the GPL
> > has no rights. the GPL is a contract; following the GPL gives
> > entities rights. SuSE can release a really
25 matches
Mail list logo
