Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 05:45:53PM +0200, Frederick Page wrote:
I noticed, there is no more downgrading of DMA mode. I did some more
tests, rebooted some more and to me it looks like this:
- cdda2wav only works with suid and drive in PIO-mode.
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:49:28PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
How do you believe that you may run cdrecord without root privs without
compromising the security of the whole system?
On OpenBSD, members of the operator group are allowed to reboot the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg
Just download from
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ProDVD/
I did, but then encountered some difficulties when
burning CD-RW on the fly via cdrecord's stdin :
Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01b31 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg
Schilling
On 23. August 2004 at 12:24AM +0200,
Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Robert Leslie's hfsutils I have created on disk the HFS
filesystem image hfs.img. I can mount hfs.img loopback and
can read and write files to it. Now would a straight cdrecord
hfs.img produce a CD that a
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the man page of cdrecord for a decription of the features
that are handled by /etc/default/cdrecord
Hmmm, that's pretty good.
Do you think you could make all the other programs
use that file too? If I define my CD-RW as QueFire
in that file,
me
Is there a relation between -dvd-compat with DVD+RW and ...
... readability of the data's tail by the common Linux drivers ?)
Andy
common Linux drivers rely on value returned by READ CAPACITY command.
The value most commonly coincides with lead-out position and is
believed and was
me
cdrecord: Must specify track size(s).
Next i set the CDR_SECURITY variable and shwoops
my pipe did work. It is reproducible: unset CDR_SECURITY
spoils it again.
Joerg
Without CDR_SECURITY, a max size if 1 GB os allowed
I see your point.
The tracksize was unknown - man cdrecord
HFS volumes you put on CD still require Apple partition
table. So the question is if hfsutils generate one. The latter
kind of goes beyond the scope of discussions on this list:-)
So the question now is: is thre a way to add this partition
table to the hfs volume?
Does the fact that you pose this
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 06:56, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the man page of cdrecord for a decription of the features
that are handled by /etc/default/cdrecord
Hmmm, that's pretty good.
Do you think you could make all the other programs
use
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote:
Does the fact that you pose this question mean that hfsutils
do not generate partition table? Once again, this kind of goes
beyond the scope of discussions on this list. I mean hfsutils
maintainer is probably more appropriate
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 06:56, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the man page of cdrecord for a decription of the features
that are handled by /etc/default/cdrecord
Hmmm, that's pretty good.
Do you
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 09:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 06:56, Joerg Schilling wrote:
It seems that you don't know that dd uses a completely
different access method for the device.
That's an implementation detail that doesn't need
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dd operates at UNIX block/raw device level
SCSI Generic operates _below_ this level and thus uses
a different naming scheme
Same thing with networking:
* Mozilla operates at the HTTP/TCP level.
* ping operates _below_ this level but does
Are there objections against having the only track of a CD
ending with 300+ kB of _ non-zero _ pad bytes rather than the
padding provided by cdrecord padsize=... or mkisofs -pad ?
A short is ok or better pad 300 kB zeros would be of help.
If this 300kb (150 sectors, 2 seconds) is to
SCSI Generic operates _below_ this level and thus uses
a different naming scheme
Same thing with networking:
* Mozilla operates at the HTTP/TCP level.
True, and nobody cares about SCSI generic because it's neither
necessary to know nor does anyone want to know (especially for IDE
FROM: THE DESK OF THE DIRECTOR PROMOTIONS,
INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE
AWARD DEPARTMENT,
REF: PLF/10 24 2601 3518
Attention:
We are pleased to inform you of the announcement today,(20th
August,2004),of winners of the PACIFICLOTTO-FIRMA WORLDLOTTO/INTERNATIONAL
SWEEPSTAKES PROGRAMS held on
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 10:40, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dd operates at UNIX block/raw device level
SCSI Generic operates _below_ this level and thus uses
a different naming scheme
Same thing
17 matches
Mail list logo
