Re: cdrecord problems

On Friday 27 July 2007 17:52, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > This does not match the current problem. > pengsens' drive refuses on any write mode which yields > this message in wodim's output > > > Supported modes: > > while in bug=413960 the according message is: > > > Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO

Re: cdrecord problems

Hi, me: > > growisofs claims to be able, cdrecord claims to be able. Joerg Schilling: > I cannot speak for growisofs but cdrecord is definitely able to correctly > copy DVD-Video with DVD+R/DL and driveropts=layerbreak=# "claims" does not mean i doubt it. I just did not test it myself. Different

Re: cdrecord problems

"Thomas Schmitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I also wonder where to find some advice about burning dual-layer DVDs. > > I couldn't do it before. Might have been my old Liteon drive, which > > later stopped working completely. > > growisofs claims to be able, cdrecord claims to be able. I cann

Re: cdrecord problems

Hi, Chris Ahlstrom: > But are there any other CD/DVD writing engines out their? Yes. libburn supports CD and single layer DVD with capabilities according to MMC-5. (That is about what growisofs can do - minus the capability to fabricate ISO-9660 multi-session on random access media which got no

Re: cdrecord problems

Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-27 18:23:15 +0200]: > > > The world is not yet ready for free information there are always trolls > > that write incorrect claim into a wiki. > > You are entirely free to correct it, I understand. There

Re: cdrecord problems

Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > Perhaps I am talking out of turn here, but isn't this mailing list > > restricted to covering the Debian fork (reference > >

Re: cdrecord problems

* Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-27 18:23:15 +0200]: > The world is not yet ready for free information there are always trolls > that write incorrect claim into a wiki. You are entirely free to correct it, I understand. > >http://www.arklinux.org/projects/dvdrtools/ > > > >

Re: cdrecord problems

Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about dvdrtools and dvd+rw-tools? I use the latter, but just > discovered the former. It looks like the dvdrtools web site is down, > though. It is not down, it's Webmaster did just delete all the content that was related to this project that is

Re: cdrecord problems

Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't mean alternate front ends, but engines. Is there a good site > with a feature matrix? This site, though amusing, does not have one: > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cdrecord The world is not yet ready for free information there are alwa

Re: cdrecord problems

Joerg Schilling wrote: Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 27 July 2007 12:00, Joerg Schilling wrote: Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, It might be this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413960 (LG drive on /dev/sg) It i

Re: cdrecord problems

"Thomas Schmitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For wodim problem reports i would post to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > although it is labeled as developer mailing list. > pengseng's problem with the drive is surely a development issue. This list is dead since 3 months as the package is.. Jörg --

Re: cdrecord problems

* Thomas Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-27 18:05:05 +0200]: > Chris Ahlstrom: > > Perhaps I am talking out of turn here, but isn't this mailing list > > restricted to covering the Debian fork (reference > > )? > > cdwrite@

Re: cdrecord problems

Chris Ahlstrom wrote: * Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-27 15:23:48 +0200]: Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just verified the bug with the original cdrtools-2.01.01a30, Sorry, but this kind of communication is not helpful, you claim things that you

Re: cdrecord problems

Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everything is described in the debian bugreport, including cause of the > problem and a fix. You can't claim that the bug was introduced by wodim > if you have not read it. The debian bug report describes a bug that is not present in the original s

Re: cdrecord problems

* Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-27 11:55:19 -0400]: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > Perhaps I am talking out of turn here, but isn't this mailing list > > restricted to covering the Debian fork (reference > >

Re: cdrecord problems

Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps I am talking out of turn here, but isn't this mailing list > restricted to covering the Debian fork (reference > )? > > That is surely my primary interest, at any rate. If your

Re: cdrecord problems

Hi, Chris Ahlstrom: > Perhaps I am talking out of turn here, but isn't this mailing list > restricted to covering the Debian fork (reference > )? cdwrite@other.debian.org is an unmoderated support and discussion list about burni

Re: cdrecord problems

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:59:36AM -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Perhaps I am talking out of turn here, but isn't this mailing list > restricted to covering the Debian fork (reference > )? No, this mailing list predates 2006 by

Re: cdrecord problems

Hi, Vladimir Nadvornik: > It might be this bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413960 This does not match the current problem. pengsens' drive refuses on any write mode which yields this message in wodim's output > Supported modes: while in bug=413960 the according message i

Re: cdrecord problems

On Friday 27 July 2007 15:23, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 27 July 2007 12:00, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > It might be this bug: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/

Re: cdrecord problems

* Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-27 15:23:48 +0200]: > Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just verified the bug with the original cdrtools-2.01.01a30, > > Sorry, but this kind of communication is not helpful, you claim things that > you do not prove. > > If you

Re: cdrecord problems

Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 27 July 2007 12:00, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > It might be this bug: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413960 > > > (LG drive on /dev/sg) > > > > > > I

Re: cdrecord problems

On Friday 27 July 2007 12:00, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It might be this bug: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413960 > > (LG drive on /dev/sg) > > > > It is fixed in wodim 1.1.6. > > This is a bug _introduced_ by wodi

Re: cdrecord problems

Vladimir Nadvornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > It might be this bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413960 > (LG drive on /dev/sg) > > It is fixed in wodim 1.1.6. This is a bug _introduced_ by wodim! It never has been in the original cdrtools. Note that recently

Re: cdrecord problems

Hi, It might be this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413960 (LG drive on /dev/sg) It is fixed in wodim 1.1.6. -- Vladimir Nadvornik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]