Re: CLOSE SESSION failed with SK=5h/INVALID FIELD IN CDB: not harmless?

2009-12-04 Thread Jens Jorgensen
Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, /dev/sr1: flushing cache /dev/sr1: closing track /dev/sr1: closing session :-[ CLOSE SESSION failed with SK=5h/INVALID FIELD IN CDB]: Input/output Such a message is rarely harmless. The drive wrote everything but failed to finish properly. Well,

Re: CLOSE SESSION failed with SK=5h/INVALID FIELD IN CDB: not harmless?

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, me: Such a message is rarely harmless. Jens: Well, that's what I thought, but Andy Polyakov commented here: http://www.mail-archive.com/cdwrite@other.debian.org/msg12106.html Oh indeed. Now i remember. I stepped into that puddle previously. So for now we count it as harmless. It is

Re: CLOSE SESSION failed with SK=5h/INVALID FIELD IN CDB: not harmless?

2009-12-04 Thread Jens Jorgensen
Thomas Schmitt wrote: When I read the block from /dev/sr0 what I get back is all-zeroes. The corresponding block on the udf image is full of non-zero data. the next 2048-byte block following 8585216 on /dev/sr1 is non-zero. Ouchers. That looks much like a failure of transport or

Re: CLOSE SESSION failed with SK=5h/INVALID FIELD IN CDB: not harmless?

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, So it certainly sees /some/ of the UDF info. Gack! It would be quite some strange incident if a zeroed block at a more or less random address would make this all a valid empty UDF filesystem. I am not sure whether the empty mount directory is really caused by the altered block(s). Maybe