Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 11:03:39PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > > I happen to be maintainer of GNU GRUB, so yes ;-) > > Nice incidence. I will leech you for the final > boot loader of the emerging libburnia OS farm. Be my guest. You can also try grub-de...@gnu.org. > > > (The questio

Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 05:30:09PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > You also do not mention that the even outdated version of mkisofs you are > > using > > contains code from me. > > This is true (at least for files prototyp.h, fctldefs.h, statdefs.h and > mconfig.h

Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:27:20PM +0100, Mario Đanić wrote: > > Both a mentor and a student, and an unofficial admin (reading all > applications, and ranking them *sigh*). Being part of the program is > very rewarding, and subsequently its a great privilege to work with a > great student. :-) >

Re: Linux, ISOFS, multi-extent files: what's the status?

2010-01-09 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Bill Davidsen wrote: > There was another error having to do with reading data at the end of > an image. Due to read ahead settings a read past end of data occurred > and the (valid) partial data was not returned to the user program. > Might that be what you are remembering? Hardly. It is rela

Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > I happen to be maintainer of GNU GRUB, so yes ;-) Nice incidence. I will leech you for the final boot loader of the emerging libburnia OS farm. > > (The question is about how one has to patch > > the boot image and/or the MBR after the block > > address of the boot image is determined.)

Re: Linux, ISOFS, multi-extent files: what's the status?

2010-01-09 Thread Bill Davidsen
Joerg Schilling wrote: Giulio wrote: I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than 4GiB-2, on Linux. I'm using - mkisofs 2.01.01a69 - kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (RHEL5)

Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Mario Đanić
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 21:55, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 09:26:33PM +0100, Mario Đanić wrote: >> > I'm considering appliing for GSoC under the GNU umbrella this summer to get >> > UDF kicked out.  The ideal would be if someone who's got good understanding >> > of this standard

Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 09:26:33PM +0100, Mario Đanić wrote: > > I'm considering appliing for GSoC under the GNU umbrella this summer to get > > UDF kicked out.  The ideal would be if someone who's got good understanding > > of this standard will be interested in mentoring this project. > > While

Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Mario Đanić
> >> Do you have plans for UDF ? >> (Problem seems to develop a proper model of how >>  the components of ECMA-167 form an UDF compliant >>  graph that implements multi-session.) > > I'm considering appliing for GSoC under the GNU umbrella this summer to get > UDF kicked out.  The ideal would be if

批----发----烟 M

2010-01-09 Thread nvyi3glg
高 ~~~ 仿 香~~~ 烟 ~ 批 发~ 139.2658.3806 杨先生~~〗

Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13

2010-01-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:49:33PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > > * Support for creating large images (> 4 GiB). > > You are aware that even quite young Linux kernels > have problems to read multi-extent files ? I didn't know about this. Thanks for noting it. > > * Support for El Tor

Re: Linux, ISOFS, multi-extent files: what's the status?

2010-01-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Giulio Orsero wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:07:25 +0100, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de > (Joerg Schilling) wrote: > > >Giulio wrote: > > > >> I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent > >> files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files lar

Re: Linux, ISOFS, multi-extent files: what's the status?

2010-01-09 Thread Giulio Orsero
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:07:25 +0100, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: >Giulio wrote: > >> I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent >> files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than >> 4GiB-2, on Linux. >When

Re: Linux, ISOFS, multi-extent files: what's the status?

2010-01-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Giulio wrote: > I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent > files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than > 4GiB-2, on Linux. > > I'm using > - mkisofs 2.01.01a69 > - kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (RHEL5) > > When I star

Re: Linux, ISOFS, multi-extent files: what's the status?

2010-01-09 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Giulio wrote: > I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent > files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than > 4GiB-2, on Linux. me: > > "..My 2.6.18 swallows the last few bytes if the file > > size is not a multiple of 2048" Giuli

Linux, ISOFS, multi-extent files: what's the status?

2010-01-09 Thread Giulio
I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than 4GiB-2, on Linux. I'm using - mkisofs 2.01.01a69 - kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (RHEL5) I had made some tests and it seemed to