On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 11:03:39PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I happen to be maintainer of GNU GRUB, so yes ;-)
>
> Nice incidence. I will leech you for the final
> boot loader of the emerging libburnia OS farm.
Be my guest. You can also try grub-de...@gnu.org.
> > > (The questio
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 05:30:09PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > You also do not mention that the even outdated version of mkisofs you are
> > using
> > contains code from me.
>
> This is true (at least for files prototyp.h, fctldefs.h, statdefs.h and
> mconfig.h
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:27:20PM +0100, Mario Đanić wrote:
>
> Both a mentor and a student, and an unofficial admin (reading all
> applications, and ranking them *sigh*). Being part of the program is
> very rewarding, and subsequently its a great privilege to work with a
> great student.
:-)
>
Hi,
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> There was another error having to do with reading data at the end of
> an image. Due to read ahead settings a read past end of data occurred
> and the (valid) partial data was not returned to the user program.
> Might that be what you are remembering?
Hardly. It is rela
Hi,
> I happen to be maintainer of GNU GRUB, so yes ;-)
Nice incidence. I will leech you for the final
boot loader of the emerging libburnia OS farm.
> > (The question is about how one has to patch
> > the boot image and/or the MBR after the block
> > address of the boot image is determined.)
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Giulio wrote:
I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent
files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than
4GiB-2, on Linux.
I'm using
- mkisofs 2.01.01a69
- kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (RHEL5)
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 21:55, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 09:26:33PM +0100, Mario Đanić wrote:
>> > I'm considering appliing for GSoC under the GNU umbrella this summer to get
>> > UDF kicked out. The ideal would be if someone who's got good understanding
>> > of this standard
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 09:26:33PM +0100, Mario Đanić wrote:
> > I'm considering appliing for GSoC under the GNU umbrella this summer to get
> > UDF kicked out. The ideal would be if someone who's got good understanding
> > of this standard will be interested in mentoring this project.
>
> While
>
>> Do you have plans for UDF ?
>> (Problem seems to develop a proper model of how
>> the components of ECMA-167 form an UDF compliant
>> graph that implements multi-session.)
>
> I'm considering appliing for GSoC under the GNU umbrella this summer to get
> UDF kicked out. The ideal would be if
高 ~~~ 仿 香~~~ 烟 ~ 批 发~ 139.2658.3806 杨先生~~〗
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:49:33PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > * Support for creating large images (> 4 GiB).
>
> You are aware that even quite young Linux kernels
> have problems to read multi-extent files ?
I didn't know about this. Thanks for noting it.
> > * Support for El Tor
Giulio Orsero wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:07:25 +0100, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
> (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>
> >Giulio wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent
> >> files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files lar
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:07:25 +0100, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
(Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>Giulio wrote:
>
>> I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent
>> files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than
>> 4GiB-2, on Linux.
>When
Giulio wrote:
> I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent
> files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than
> 4GiB-2, on Linux.
>
> I'm using
> - mkisofs 2.01.01a69
> - kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (RHEL5)
>
>
When I star
Hi,
Giulio wrote:
> I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent
> files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than
> 4GiB-2, on Linux.
me:
> > "..My 2.6.18 swallows the last few bytes if the file
> > size is not a multiple of 2048"
Giuli
I'd like to understand what are the pitfalls, if any, in using multi-extent
files, as enabled by mkisofs "--iso-level 3" option for files larger than
4GiB-2, on Linux.
I'm using
- mkisofs 2.01.01a69
- kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 (RHEL5)
I had made some tests and it seemed to
16 matches
Mail list logo