I have tried with at least two different media and had the exact same
problem with both of them. And the ones I currently use, Sony, are in
the official list of compatible media from NEC for my writer. I am using
the newest firmware.
So I guess even if I try with other media, it will fail at 4x
Bill Davidsen wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
If I burn with 2.4x instead of 4x, there seems to be no problem. I
wonder what this could mean.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
> > Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> >
> >>> If I burn with 2.4x instead of 4x, there seems to be no problem. I
> >>> wonder what this could mean.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> It means that the drive isn't adapting properly to the media, but
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
If I burn with 2.4x instead of 4x, there seems to be no problem. I
wonder what this could mean.
It means that the drive isn't adapting properly to the media, but with
2.4x it falls within the tolerances the reading drive can handle.
I found that a Pi
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
If I burn with 2.4x instead of 4x, there seems to be no problem. I
wonder what this could mean.
It means that the drive isn't adapting properly to the media, but with
2.4x it falls within the tolerances the reading drive can handle.
I found that a Pioneer A106 never had
Torsten Römer wrote:
Seth Kurtzberg schrieb:
> I think that it is a safe bet that if you have visible damage on the
> DVD, your hardware (drive) has problems. Nothing is 100% certain, but
> that is close to 100% certain, especially as the same hardware used to
> work.
>
> Seth
>
If I burn with 2.4
> If I burn with 2.4x instead of 4x, there seems to be no problem. I
> wonder what this could mean.
It means that the drive isn't adapting properly to the media, but with
2.4x it falls within the tolerances the reading drive can handle.
I found that a Pioneer A106 never had problems burning Verb
Seth Kurtzberg schrieb:
> I think that it is a safe bet that if you have visible damage on the
> DVD, your hardware (drive) has problems. Nothing is 100% certain, but
> that is close to 100% certain, especially as the same hardware used to
> work.
>
> Seth
>
If I burn with 2.4x instead of 4x, ther
I think that it is a safe bet that if you have visible damage on the
DVD, your hardware (drive) has problems. Nothing is 100% certain, but
that is close to 100% certain, especially as the same hardware used to work.
Seth
Torsten Römer wrote:
Hello,
Usually, burning DVDs worked pretty fine for m
Hello,
Usually, burning DVDs worked pretty fine for me. But in the last time,
it fails more and more frequently.
I can already hear when it is going to fail: On the beginning of the
burning process the drive speeds up, then slows down again and sounds a
click. Then burning either fails with an
10 matches
Mail list logo
