Michael Shell wrote:
Thanks for the tips Volker, Greg and Bill. ;)
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
DVDs are much more precise in finding the spot again from which to
continue burning, especially DVD+ which I understand is similar to
DVD-RAM. DVD-RAM effectively goes on nothing but underruns. You
needn't
Thanks for the tips Volker, Greg and Bill. ;)
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
DVDs are much more precise in finding the spot again from which to
continue burning, especially DVD+ which I understand is similar to
DVD-RAM. DVD-RAM effectively goes on nothing but underruns. You
needn't be concerned
If it's write-once, it needs a simulation mode, IMHO.
A while ago I would have unconditionally agreed. Now I ask whether an
erasable would do the same trick. It's also a question of media cost -
currently 4.7G media is cheap enough to not worry too much about a
coaster.
On the other hand,
Michael Shell wrote:
Note also that I have always used -dao/sao mode with CDs to get an
"faithful" reproduction of whatever image I wanted to burn. (Furthermore,
I do not trust the "burnfree" approach - if I get an underrun during
recording, I won't trust the disk.)
I don't know why
Greetings,
I have a few questions concerning DVD+R[W] writing. IMHO, I think the
issues brought up here are prime candidates to add to the existing
sources of information on DVD writing software (such as the important
FAQs and READMEs or the dvd+rw-tools and cdrecord-ProDVD applications).
Wow, what a well-researched posting! Talk about putting fingers into all
the sore spots...
I am using a Toshiba SD-R5272 DVD+/-RW drive on an older K6-2 400Mhz
Linux 2.6.8.1 system (which is even further slowed by the need to
disable IDE DMA due to hardware issues).
The maximum system
6 matches
Mail list logo
