[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got reports from a user who has good performance with hda
> and 1.0x performance with hdb as data source for burning
> to hdc. No deeper reason known. The disks are identical.
>
> There are reports about slow growisofs if fed by a pipe
> (not for me.) But you wrote abo
Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are those who argue that DVD-RAM is the only useful one for
> backups, "because it was designed as a backup format". It does give you
> more or less unlimited overwrites, has the advantage of treating your
> media as a read-write harddisk (no mast
Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've tried to search the archive and various FAQs but I more confused
> than before.
>
> I've just bought my first DVD burner (LG GSA-4167B) which supports
> several DVD formats. I've burnt my first DVD-R disc which succeeded
> but a bit slow. cdr
Hi,
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I've tried to search the archive and various FAQs but I more confused
> than before.
This impression represents the current state of the art.
Expect any weird behavior of firmware and media.
> DVD burner (LG GSA-4167B) [...] which media (format) should I use.
I
> but a bit slow. cdrecordProDVD reported "DMA speed to slow) (OK for 8x)
> but then the average write speed was only 1.5x ( for a chunk of 3.6Gb).
> Is there any explanation for this?
Check DMA is turned on for the drive. Where did the image data come
from? There can be problems with pipes, beca
Hi,
I've tried to search the archive and various FAQs but I more confused
than before.
I've just bought my first DVD burner (LG GSA-4167B) which supports
several DVD formats. I've burnt my first DVD-R disc which succeeded
but a bit slow. cdrecordProDVD reported "DMA speed to slow) (OK for 8x)
but
6 matches
Mail list logo
