Re: Growisofs input cache --> Patch

2008-12-08 Thread David Weisgerber
On Saturday 06 December 2008 12:35:14 Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > David Weisgerber wrote: > > So I will create a patch which adds such a switch to growisofs > > Andy Polyakov wrote earlier: > > There is a way to open image without O_DIRECT and without modifying > > source code: growisofs -Z /de

Re: Growisofs input cache --> Patch

2008-12-09 Thread Bill Davidsen
David Weisgerber wrote: On Saturday 06 December 2008 12:35:14 Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Weisgerber wrote: So I will create a patch which adds such a switch to growisofs Andy Polyakov wrote earlier: There is a way to open image without O_DIRECT and without modifying

Re: Growisofs input cache --> Patch

2008-12-09 Thread Andy Polyakov
> In the mean time I created a patch for growisofs which I hope will be > included > in the future (see attachment). *If* such option will be added, it would go as -use-the-force-luke option, not straight one. A. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: Growisofs input cache --> Patch

2008-12-10 Thread David Weisgerber
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 21:48:25 Bill Davidsen wrote: > David Weisgerber wrote: > > Tested: 4x2742 MB > > > > Run 1 (w/o -no-directio): 5:37 min (for the slowest DVD recorder) > > Mem: 2060284k total, 593336k used, 1466948k free,15972k buffers > > > > Run 2 (w -no-directio): 4:38 min (

Re: Growisofs input cache --> Patch

2008-12-10 Thread David Weisgerber
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 23:56:47 Andy Polyakov wrote: > > In the mean time I created a patch for growisofs which I hope will be > > included in the future (see attachment). > > *If* such option will be added, it would go as -use-the-force-luke > option, not straight one. A. I would even write

Re: Growisofs input cache --> Patch

2008-12-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In Run 1 there were several buffer underruns which slowed the DVD recorders > > down. In Run 2 the buffer was always at 100% (except for the end of > > course) :-). > > > > This seems reasonable, what were the performance numbers for the other > s

Re: Growisofs input cache --> Patch

2009-01-14 Thread Bill Davidsen
Joerg Schilling wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: In Run 1 there were several buffer underruns which slowed the DVD recorders down. In Run 2 the buffer was always at 100% (except for the end of course) :-). This seems reasonable, what were the performance numbers for the other system