Joerg Schilling wrote:
Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The incorrect perms are a result of the bugs in the mkisofs version that comes
with Redhat.
Actually I was always talking about the permissions/timestamp on the test
directory "dir1", these were incorrect even when the i
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please check again with the following patch, it should then work even without
-find:
Thank you for the patch.
Well, if a problem was described decently, I am usually able to explain how to
correctly use mkis
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:48:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >The incorrect perms are a result of the bugs in the mkisofs version that
>> >comes
>> >with Redhat.
>>
>> Actually I was always talking about the permissions/timestamp o
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please check again with the following patch, it should then work even
> > without
> > -find:
> >
> >
>
> Thank you for the patch.
Well, if a problem was described decently, I am usually able to explain how to
correctly use mkisofs or to create a
Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The incorrect perms are a result of the bugs in the mkisofs version that
> >comes
> >with Redhat.
>
> Actually I was always talking about the permissions/timestamp on the test
> directory "dir1", these were incorrect even when the iso was created with
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
isoinfo output was always right (at least as for permissions and timestamp
which I was interested in).
isoinfo displayed wrong timestamps for "." and ".." with the old mkisofs clone
that comes with RedHat.
isoinfo sti
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:50:09 -0400, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I believe that this may be a result of the loop mount.
I used loop mount just as a quick test case.
I first encountered the issue with real DVDs on which I burned the iso
image.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:57:18 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That very same iso image, when mounted on Linux, would:
>> - show uncorrect perms/timestamp if mounted on RHEL5
>> - show correct perms/timestamp if mounted on RHEL3
>
>The
Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> isoinfo output was always right (at least as for permissions and timestamp
> which I was interested in).
isoinfo displayed wrong timestamps for "." and ".." with the old mkisofs clone
that comes with RedHat.
isoinfo still displayes wrong timestamps fo
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:06:33 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>> So, is this a RHEL5 general fs issue or a RHEL5 isofs issue?
>>
>> Why would the method used my mkisofs matter if isoinfo show the same output?
>
>I don't understand you.
>
>I thought that isoinfo shows the correct o
Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >OK, so the filesystem does not behave as expected on UNIX:
> >
> >If "." and ".." are delivered at all, they come first.
> >
> >In any case, the -find variant of the command line I send you should
> >work. Did you test it?
>
> Sorry, I hadn't seen it, he
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:23:23 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:37:03 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] d0]# ls -la isotest
>> total 32
>> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 9
Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:37:03 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> >
> >> "Giulio Orsero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > mkisofs 2.01.01a42 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1993-1997 Eric
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:37:03 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>
>> "Giulio Orsero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > mkisofs 2.01.01a42 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1993-1997 Eric
>> > Youngdale (C
>> > ) 1997-2008 Jörg Schilling
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> "Giulio Orsero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > # isoinfo -version
> > isoinfo 2.01.01a42 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1993-1999 Eric
> > Youngdale (C
> > ) 1999-2008 Jörg Schilling
> > # mkisofs -version
> > mkisofs 2.01.01a42 (i686-pc-linux-gnu
"Giulio Orsero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # isoinfo -version
> isoinfo 2.01.01a42 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1993-1999 Eric Youngdale
> (C
> ) 1999-2008 Jörg Schilling
> # mkisofs -version
> mkisofs 2.01.01a42 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1993-1997 Eric Youngdale
> (C
> ) 1997-200
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Joerg Schilling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sory but you listed several problems the definitely have been fixed in
> the
> original 2 years ago:
>
>> Unknown file type (unallocated) isotest/.. - ignoring and continuing.
>
> e.g. this one
>
> If you still se
"Giulio Orsero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> # uname -r
> >> 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5
> >> # mkisofs -version
> >> mkisofs 2.01 (cpu-pc-linux-gnu)
> >> (I tried stock 2.01.01a
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> # uname -r
>> 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5
>> # mkisofs -version
>> mkisofs 2.01 (cpu-pc-linux-gnu)
>> (I tried stock 2.01.01a42 with no change)
> You are NOT using mkisofs and this is t
Giulio Orsero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is very likely a CENTOS5 (RHEL5) isofs driver issue, but since it's
> very weird I thought to ask here whether someone can reproduce it just to be
> sure this is not a misconfiguration/error on my part.
>
> Problem: dirs on which an mkisofs exclusion
This is very likely a CENTOS5 (RHEL5) isofs driver issue, but since it's
very weird I thought to ask here whether someone can reproduce it just to be
sure this is not a misconfiguration/error on my part.
Problem: dirs on which an mkisofs exclusion is made show with wrong
permissions/timestamp when
21 matches
Mail list logo
