On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 18:34 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> My knee jerk reaction is: you could try a first step at checking if it's
> a problem with loader applied relocations, or, if it's a runtime,
> post loader problem. Replace your debug '#if 0' by, say,
>
> at global scope:
> volatile int print
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 18:53:10, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2009/12/29 Pedro Alves :
> > My knee jerk reaction is: you could try a first step at checking if it's
> > a problem with loader applied relocations, or, if it's a runtime,
> > post loader problem. Replace your debug '#if 0' by, s
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 08:34:12, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 18:00 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > I also see that you set -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 in the Makefile. I wish
> > > people would stop doing that. _WIN32_IE is not meant for CE
On Monday 28 December 2009 17:00:11, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> >> btw, feel free to mention any improvements about the port (see the README
> >> file, about the optimization flags, for example)
> >
> >> From said README:
> >
> >> 7) Compilation
> >>
> >>
My knee jerk reaction is: you could try a first step at checking if it's
a problem with loader applied relocations, or, if it's a runtime,
post loader problem. Replace your debug '#if 0' by, say,
at global scope:
volatile int print_base = 0;
{
...
if (print_base)
wsprintf(msg, L"Ptr %p", &
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 16:28 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 December 2009 14:49:36, Danny Backx wrote:
> > Replacing the underlying function do_pseudo_reloc() by an empty one also
> > got the DLL to load. Adding MessageBoxW() calls to print the arguments
> > succeeds, until I try to print
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:49:36 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 10:00 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
>> I just committed a cleaned up version of my current work.
>>
>> This now has .edata and .idata sections hidden in .rdata, and can
>> generate working DLL and EXEs but with the SizeOfI
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 14:49:36, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 10:00 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> > I just committed a cleaned up version of my current work.
> >
> > This now has .edata and .idata sections hidden in .rdata, and can
> > generate working DLL and EXEs but with the Si
Here are a couple of DLLs that were tweaked as described in my earlier
mail. Please let me know if they behave.
http://danny.backx.info/download/cegcc/libexpat-1.dll
http://danny.backx.info/download/cegcc/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll
http://danny.backx.info/download/cegcc/libstdc++-6.dll
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dann
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 10:00 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> I just committed a cleaned up version of my current work.
>
> This now has .edata and .idata sections hidden in .rdata, and can
> generate working DLL and EXEs but with the SizeOfImage <= 1 limit.
>
> Danny
I found one more issue,
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 18:00 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > I also see that you set -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 in the Makefile. I wish
> > people would stop doing that. _WIN32_IE is not meant for CE
> > usage. If you do need it, it's a bug in the w32api headers
11 matches
Mail list logo
