Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2010-04-05 Thread mobi phil
> However, when I want to run the executable on my HTC Wizard, the phone tells > me that my executable is not signed. > Yes, I remember now this problem with windows mobile 5. Hello. I am running cegcc generated programs on 6.1, and I think it was running on 6.5 as well (I removed 6.5 after the fi

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-12 Thread Vincent R.
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:45:35 +0100, Sébastien Lorquet wrote: > Re-Hello, > > I can confirm that > > wget > http://www.unsads.com/~squalyl/wincehello.c > /opt/mingw32ce/bin/arm-mingw32ce-gcc wincehello.c -o wincehello.exe > > produces a valid 24.7kB

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-12 Thread Sébastien Lorquet
Re-Hello, I can confirm that wget http://www.unsads.com/~squalyl/wincehello.c /opt/mingw32ce/bin/arm-mingw32ce-gcc wincehello.c -o wincehello.exe produces a valid 24.7kB executable that runs without signature on my device. So the problem does not

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-12 Thread Sébastien Lorquet
Hi, My device is a HTC wizard from Orange France (SPV branded) It was simlocked, I desimlocked it. The os is reported as: Microsoft Windows Mobile Version 5.0 System 5.1.195 (build 14847.2.0.0) here are my tries. -generated a self-signed CA -installed it on the device, success. -generated a key

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-11 Thread Vincent R.
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:31:38 +, "Hywel B. Richards" wrote: > Vincent R. wrote: >> >> NO and NO! >> I am talking about Windows Mobile >= 5 not Windows CE ,just for >> information >> >> Windows Mobile 5 = ARM + windows ce 5.1 + specific GUI >> Windows Mobile 6 = ARM + windows ce 5.2 + specifi

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-11 Thread Danny Backx
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:13 +0100, Vincent R. wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:15:08 +0100, Danny Backx > wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:45 +0100, Vincent R. wrote: > >> binaries generated by cegcc cannot be run on windows mobile >= 5 > without > >> packing them > >> or modifying registry. > >

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-11 Thread Hywel B. Richards
Vincent R. wrote: > > NO and NO! > I am talking about Windows Mobile >= 5 not Windows CE ,just for > information > > Windows Mobile 5 = ARM + windows ce 5.1 + specific GUI > Windows Mobile 6 = ARM + windows ce 5.2 + specific GUI > > and you know that cegcc binaries don't work on Windows Mobile .

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-11 Thread Vincent R.
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:15:08 +0100, Danny Backx wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:45 +0100, Vincent R. wrote: >> binaries generated by cegcc cannot be run on windows mobile >= 5 without >> packing them >> or modifying registry. > > I don't think this is entirely accurate. CE complains but allows

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-11 Thread Danny Backx
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:45 +0100, Vincent R. wrote: > binaries generated by cegcc cannot be run on windows mobile >= 5 without > packing them > or modifying registry. I don't think this is entirely accurate. CE complains but allows you to run them. Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - a

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-10 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:41:50 -0300, Pablo Rogina wrote: > Sebastien, > > I'm working with a MS desktop project that signs the executable file. > In the Visual Studio project settings, at the Post-Build Event in > Build Events there is the command: > > "signtool.exe" sign /f "cert.pfx" /d "Applic

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-10 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:03:20 +0100, Sébastien Lorquet wrote: > Okay, the certificate was required in DER format, mine was PEM. This part > is > solved with an openssl one-liner. > > I believe that if I get my .exe signed with a certificate issued by my now > installed CA, the code will run. Am I

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-10 Thread Pablo Rogina
Sebastien, I'm working with a MS desktop project that signs the executable file. In the Visual Studio project settings, at the Post-Build Event in Build Events there is the command: "signtool.exe" sign /f "cert.pfx" /d "ApplicationName" /t "http://timestamp.verisign.com/scripts/timstamp.dll"; "$

Re: [Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-10 Thread Sébastien Lorquet
Okay, the certificate was required in DER format, mine was PEM. This part is solved with an openssl one-liner. I believe that if I get my .exe signed with a certificate issued by my now installed CA, the code will run. Am I true? Regards, Sebastien. ---

[Cegcc-devel] News about Qt

2009-11-10 Thread Sébastien Lorquet
Hi, I response to my thread ( http://lists.trolltech.com/pipermail/qt-wince-interest/2009-November/000745.html) , Maurice Kalinowski posted a git tree of a cegcc compilable Qt for windows CE ( http://lists.trolltech.com/pipermail/qt-wince-interest/2009-November/000764.html) I managed to compile Q