Danny Backx escreveu:
>
> What is the issue why you wanted me to put the profile and docs build
> after the gdb build ?
> > function build_all
> > {
> > build_binutils
> > @@ -261,6 +286,7 @@
> > build_gdb
> > build_gdbstub
> > build_docs
> > +build_profile
> > }
> >
>
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 18:10 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx escreveu:
> > On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 12:45 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 10:38 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >>> Danny Backx wrote:
> Second set of patches included.
>
> My option would be to get
Danny Backx escreveu:
> On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 12:45 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
>> On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 10:38 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> Danny Backx wrote:
Second set of patches included.
My option would be to get this in SVN, then continue work on the getenv
replacement and c
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 12:45 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 10:38 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Danny Backx wrote:
> > > Second set of patches included.
> > >
> > > My option would be to get this in SVN, then continue work on the getenv
> > > replacement and command line option.
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 10:38 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > Second set of patches included.
> >
> > My option would be to get this in SVN, then continue work on the getenv
> > replacement and command line option.
> >
>
> Ok, go ahead.
It struck me just now that I didn't do an
Danny Backx wrote:
> Second set of patches included.
>
> My option would be to get this in SVN, then continue work on the getenv
> replacement and command line option.
>
Ok, go ahead.
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
> Danny
>
>
> ---
Second set of patches included.
My option would be to get this in SVN, then continue work on the getenv
replacement and command line option.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
Index: mingw/ChangeLog.mingw32ce
===
Danny Backx wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 15:35 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
>>Danny Backx wrote:
>>
>>
>@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
> #
>+# This is a Makefile.in for very limited use : only create and install
>+# the profiling runtime for cegcc (arm-wince-cegcc and
>arm-wince-mingw32ce).
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 15:35 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>
> >
> >> > @@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
> >> > #
> >> > +# This is a Makefile.in for very limited use : only create and install
> >> > +# the profiling runtime for cegcc (arm-wince-cegcc and
> >> > arm-wince-mingw32ce).
> >> > +#
>
Danny Backx wrote:
>
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
>> > #
>> > +# This is a Makefile.in for very limited use : only create and install
>> > +# the profiling runtime for cegcc (arm-wince-cegcc and
>> > arm-wince-mingw32ce).
>> > +#
>> > +# This should NOT be fed back to the MingW project as is, it doesn'
Answers to your remarks, but no patch file yet, I'm still testing my
changes.
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 21:57 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Not yet. Comments inline with your patch below. I've removed the
> autogenerated files for clarity. Please post the patches as text, not as
> tar.gz. After all,
Danny Backx escreveu:
> Err, that latest commit wasn't to mingwex. There's also one or two
> debugging statements still in there. I'll make sure to remove those
> prior to commit. The rest of my message is still valid :-)
>
> Danny
>
> On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 12:11 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
>
Err, that latest commit wasn't to mingwex. There's also one or two
debugging statements still in there. I'll make sure to remove those
prior to commit. The rest of my message is still valid :-)
Danny
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 12:11 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Here's the profiling s
Guys,
Here's the profiling support patch. I've taken it out of the branch and
put it on trunk, but I've not imported Pedro's latest change (to
mingw/mingwex) yet so this may slightly conflict there.
Pedro, is this good enough for commit ?
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarle
14 matches
Mail list logo
