On 4/29/22 17:58, Bird, Tim wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Sorry about that.
These things happen. :)
> Given that you're posting on this list, I think you have the information, but
> here is
> the link to the mailing list:
> https://lists.celinuxforum.org/g/main
The "message history" at the bottom of that
The "Join the developer mailing list" link on https://www.celinuxforum.org is
404.
Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1271):
https://lists.celinuxforum.org/g/Celinux-dev/message/1271
Mute This Topic: https://lists.celinuxforum.or
On 8/19/20 5:36 PM, Bird, Tim wrote:
>> I don't know if anybody downloaded my 2015 toybox talk, I can't find that one
>> locally...
...
> BTW - do you have a copy of your presentation from that year? The link on the
> presentations page is missing a file.
> -- Tim
I usually youtube-dl an archive
On 8/18/20 3:18 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Amit Agarwal
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> We are planning to reorganize the wiki pages on eLinux.org by presenting the
>> content of ELC conferences of the last 15 years (ELC, ELCE
>> and Japan Technical Jamboree) based on Catego
On 03/04/2016 01:45 AM, Satoru Ueda wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please be advised that the next Japan Jamboree is scheduled on March 11th
> （Friday next week) at Nakano Sunplaza.
>
> March 11th, Japan Technical Jamboree.
> http://elinux.org/Japan_Technical_Jamboree_56
Did you record video of this on
On 10/18/2015 07:41 PM, Satoru Ueda wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> The video for last Japan Technical Jamboree released. Please look into the
> wiki page
> which you will see the link to YouTube.
>
> http://elinux.org/Japan_Technical_Jamboree_54
The j-core stuff is in english. (Thrill to my attempt to
On 04/11/2015 02:20 PM, Rowand, Frank wrote:
> In recent years there have been proposed tools to aid in the creation of valid
> device trees and in debugging device tree issues. An example of this is the
> various approaches proposed (with source code provided) to validate device
> tree
> source
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Rowand, Frank
wrote:
> In recent years there have been proposed tools to aid in the creation of valid
> device trees and in debugging device tree issues. An example of this is the
> various approaches proposed (with source code provided) to validate device
> tree
On 10/02/2013 03:33:08 PM, Bird, Tim wrote:
; Summary: Kernel module binary compatibility with debug features
; Proposer: Tim Bird, Sony Mobile
== Description ==
Sometimes, the workflow for embedded systems include obtaining kernel
modules from
3rd party vendors or other software teams. In ce
On 03/19/2013 12:38:28 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
I don't often do this, but I just read a white paper by Benjamin Zores
on the relationship between Android and traditional embedded Linux,
that
I thought was quite good.
It's a bit of a subtle advertisement for the Linux Foundation's
training cours
On 02/06/2013 12:08:40 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
Hi everyone,
Embedded Linux Conference is just around the corner -
February 20-22 in San Francisco.
I still can't find a link from the Linux Foundation's CELF website to
where I should submit my talk outline. I emailed it to you, but it's
still
On 04/28/2012 08:09 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 04/28/2012 04:15 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 04/27/2012 01:08 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>>> On 26/04/12 15:14, Rob Landley wrote:
>>>>> I have also been able to boot an ARM noMMU kernel for the AT91x40 SoC
>>>
On 04/27/2012 01:08 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 26/04/12 15:14, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> I have also been able to boot an ARM noMMU kernel for the AT91x40 SoC
>>> under SkyEye. This time, the userspace works fine. I haven't had the
>>> time to clean up this,
On 04/25/2012 03:41 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:14:09 -0500,
> Rob Landley a écrit :
>
>> Query: is there any way to set up a nommu system with:
>>
>> A) stock vanilla upstream packages (kernel, uClibc, busybox)
>> B) r
On 04/24/2012 05:22 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
> On 04/24/2012 03:13 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
>>> On 04/24/2012 12:22 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>>>> On 04/18/2012 10:25 AM, Gross, Mark wrote:
>>>>>
On 04/24/2012 10:21 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 05:22 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 04/18/2012 10:25 AM, Gross, Mark wrote:
>>> I'd like to see Linux fit in stuff that this too :
>>> http://olimex.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/unix-on-pic32-meet-retrobsd-f
On 04/24/2012 10:31 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 07:33 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 04/24/2012 02:35 PM, Ezequiel Garc�a wrote:
>>>> Linux in under 2 megabytes of RAM, even when running from ROM, is not a
>>>> realistic goal. For context: linux 0.
On 04/24/2012 05:12 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
>> I'd probably browbeat the device tree guys into helping me because this
>> should be entirely device tree based from day 1. Pretty much the FIRST
>> thing you add after "hello world" is a device tree parser, because that
>> tells you how much memory you've
On 04/24/2012 05:02 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
> On 04/24/2012 12:22 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 04/18/2012 10:25 AM, Gross, Mark wrote:
>>> I'd like to see Linux fit in stuff that this too :
>>> http://olimex.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/unix-on-pic32-meet-retrobsd-for-d
On 04/24/2012 03:06 PM, Ezequiel García wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/4/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>>> It seems Linux is not aiming that low after all, however a little
>>> effort to try to un-bloat the current
>>> state of things can't hurt, right?
>>
>> Do you know the state of uCLinux, when those op
On 04/24/2012 02:47 PM, Gross, Mark wrote:
> Thanks for the historical context! (I didn't get into linux until the
> 2.2 days).
Computer history is a hobby of mine. You might like this:
http://landley.net/history/mirror/linux/linux-history.html
I went through the archives and picked out posts
> It seems Linux is not aiming that low after all, however a little
> effort to try to un-bloat the current
> state of things can't hurt, right?
There's plenty of low hanging fruit, yes. But I think linux-tiny is
actually going about it all wrong. My rant on the subject is her
On 04/18/2012 10:25 AM, Gross, Mark wrote:
> I'd like to see Linux fit in stuff that this too :
> http://olimex.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/unix-on-pic32-meet-retrobsd-for-duinomite/
Linux in under 2 megabytes of RAM, even when running from ROM, is not a
realistic goal. For context: linux 0.0.1 was d
On 01/04/2012 11:31 AM, lkcl luke wrote:
> folks, hi,
>
> i just pointed dr richard stallman at the celinux.org web site,
> because of a project involving potentially FSF-Hardware-Endorseable
> products. i happened to mention that the license on the contributions
> to elinux.org are under the FDL
24 matches
Mail list logo
