Hi All,
Maybe we aim for one every 2 months at the moment. What's probably
useful is for people to email me or the list with items they would
like to bring up in a conference call discussion.
Maybe the first one should be kept to something short - like an hour.
Then from there we can see what we
Alan Garny wrote:
As you know, there is a CellML 1.0 version of the epicardial version of the
ten Tusscher model, which we have. I computed that model for one-second
worth of cardiac activity, plotting the trans-membrane potential. From
there, we could extrapolate to 70 minutes by saying that
Hi all,
I have just been looking through the graphing metadata specification
(http://www.cellml.org/specifications/metadata/graphs) and have a couple
of questions (pretty much due to my continuing RDF ignorance). This
specification seems to have dropped behind the simulation specification
a
David Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
I have just been looking through the graphing metadata specification
(http://www.cellml.org/specifications/metadata/graphs) and have a couple
of questions (pretty much due to my continuing RDF ignorance). This
specification seems to have dropped behind the
Hi all,
The RFC defining the correct media type for CellML documents to be
application/cellml+xml has now been published, as RFC4708.
It can now be viewed at ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4708.txt.
Best regards,
Andrew Miller
___
Andrew Miller wrote:
David Nickerson wrote:
Thanks Andrew, cleared a few things up. So now for some more
ideas/questions...
When defining a graph outside the scope of a single model or when
combining results from multiple model's, does it still make sense to use
the about=modelid ?
I
